|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 388
CEG\'er
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 388 |
i know ive seen a car in the past on here.....has anyone run direct port....if so was it wet or dry...how big a shot and what kit did u use...ohh and yes i tried a search 
2000 t-red SVT
****too quick for civics****
i have a few tricks up my sleeve
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760 |
Ryan
Trollin!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 388
CEG\'er
|
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 388 |
so all direct port setups are wet.???
2000 t-red SVT
****too quick for civics****
i have a few tricks up my sleeve
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025 |
everytime i come around you see bling bling! 
Jim Hahn
1996 T-Red Contour SE Reborn 4/6/04
3.0L swap and Arizona Dyno Chip Turbo Kit
364 whp, 410 wtq @ 4,700 rpm
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by RTStabler51:
er, direct port = wet.
Hmmm...
So are you saying that you don't think there can be a direct port dry setup then.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760 |
No, but how many direct port dry set ups have you seen? Ever seen a company sell a direct port dry set up? IMO it would be stoopid to run a direct port dry kit, plus I would think you would piece it together. Originally posted by DemonSVT:
Originally posted by RTStabler51:
er, direct port = wet.
Hmmm...
So are you saying that you don't think there can be a direct port dry setup then.
Ryan
Trollin!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by RTStabler51:
IMO it would be stoopid to run a direct port dry kit, plus I would think you would piece it together
So then IYO a returnless car will never be able to run a direct port setup then.
I may hold you to that you know. 
BTW - why is a single entry dry kit fine & dandy but when it evenly distributes the nitrous to each port it's stoopid???
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810 |
Yeah, what he said!?
warmonger
Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760
356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas!
See My Mods
'05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red
'06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760 |
IMO, its stewpid because why put all that work into a dry diret port kit? I'd much rather have both fuel & air going in at the same time and not worrying as much about the injectors and such.
and I never said the a returnless car would never be able to run a direct port kit. Mustangs do it so whyy wouldn't a CSVT? I would think though, it would be easier and more feasible to add another fuel system to the returnless car for it though.
Ryan
Trollin!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by RTStabler51:
IMO, its stewpid because why put all that work into a dry diret port kit? I'd much rather have both fuel & air going in at the same time and not worrying as much about the injectors and such.
2. and I never said the a returnless car would never be able to run a direct port kit. Mustangs do it so whyy wouldn't a CSVT? I would think though, it would be easier and more feasible to add another fuel system to the returnless car for it though.
1. That makes NO sense at all.
Why? Exactly why I stated. It evenly distributes the nitrous to every cylinder. The amount of work involved would be considerably less then rigging up even a single point wet system on a returnless car and more reliable to boot.
If anything running a wet system with a single TB entry is stupid.  It's not distibuting the mixture evenly and it's running fuel through a manifold Never intended for liquid flow!
With that in mind a single entry dry kit is a much better idea because it's just distributing a gas (as in form not fuel) unevenly to the cylinders. Not running and puddling a liquid in a manifold not designed for it.
2. It's More feasible to add "a-whole-nother fuel system" to the car verses simple PCM programming???
Adding a completely seperate fuel system and you would make a ton of work, bugs to fix and headaches for yourself. Also so many more components and areas to get a failure point in.
Heck using the VCN-2000 kit in a direct port setup and you would only need a small amount of fine A/F tuning. This setup would also be completely controllable from the cockpit! Infinitely superior to any other setup!
Cockpit controllable shot, several different shot modes, self programmable rpm points, every cylinder getting an equal dose of juice, make sure to have plenty of extra injector pulse width! (I.E. 24lbers on a 3L ), and it doesn't hurt if you have a self programmable chip with 4 settings plus a baseline one.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
