Allow me to ask the following open questions:
1) In what circumstances do you feel military action is appropriate? (In general; I'm just curious)
2) Does the action of a dictator proven to be a threat to his own people and his neighbors over 30 years justify the military response, regardless of the stated reasons, or does the correct "political" interpretation and representation by a international body, along with the appropriate amount of "diplomacy" and a majority or unanimous vote by UN-countries that are known financial supporters of this dictatorial entity required before action takes place? (OK, loaded question. Don't answer this one unless you want to)
3) How do you qualify peace? (as it's MUCH more than the mere absence of war)
4) How would you qualify a threat to the US? Did you consider Al-Qaeda a threat before or after you saw two planes plow into the WTC?
5) Tie-in to #1. In what wars/conflicts that the US has been involved in, which ones would you consider yourself a supporter of? Why?
