|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810 |
I'm not saying it has to be dry. To me that depends on the duty cycle of the injectors before you add the nitrous and how much room you have to play with. If you have plenty of fuel left in the injectors to match what you want to put in, then by all means run a dry setup. If you are running a good direct port system you eliminate the dangers of fuel puddling so I don't see that as a problem. The wet system would work fine that way, then you only have to worry about the capacity of your fuel lines. The main benefit is precise metering of nitrous for each cylinder which adds up to More and Safer power.
warmonger
Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760
356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas!
See My Mods
'05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red
'06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 62
CEG\'er
|
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 62 |
So any suggestions between the NOS brand D.P. system or the Nitrous Express D.P. system? Experiences....?
Parts theory: "Run them til you bust them, and then upgrade"
2000 Svt
Black/Tan
H&R Springs
B&M Short Throw
Intake w/K&N
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760 |
just curious.....how are you gonna run a wet kit on a returnless style car? Didn't think that was possible....yet?
Ryan
Trollin!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,506
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 3,506 |
I have to second that...DemonSVT posting in a different fourm, said that the returnless systems can only use a dry kit...Wet kits(I.E. Direct Port) cannot be used on the returnless style fuel systems....now on the return style might be a possibility.
Roz
3.0 SVT hybrid...all the fixens...Track/Race ready very soon!!!!!! 20,000 + miles
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by warmonger:
To me that depends on the duty cycle of the injectors before you add the nitrous and how much room you have to play with.
There in lies the problem for returnless cars.
Keyser stated the limit of the 19lb injectors was ~225FWHP when he was doing testing. Being as you can't just raise fuel rail pressure you are limited to the PCM's control of the fuel pump and max injector pulse width.
Now you can get a chip that alters the PCM's control of the fuel pump. (I've seen all the tables - it would not be impossible to tune it for nitrous - one could use a wet kit too)
However 225FWHP is just a small shot of juice away without it.
I know VenomSVT (when he had his) had serious problems running more than just a small dose of nitrous with the VCN-2000.
Also jumping to 24lb injectors would be serious overkill the other 99.9% of the time you are not running juice.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 260
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 260 |
Originally posted by RTStabler51:
Why do all that plumbing and then run a dry kit? Waste of time. If you are going to do direct port, then it needs to be wet IMO. More power. If you are going to do dry then I wouldn't do over 100hp shot, period. Like I said, I have a picture of someone's set up, but don't know who's it is.
Hey thats my car.. Lol yeah thats it.. If ya wanta know more let me know...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
