But I'm not too lazy to defend my stance.
I notice you don't even comment on the meat of my argument. What was that I heard you mention about substance and contributing. You feel it is necessary to comment on an aside comment while totally bypassing the thesis of my arguement. So right back at ya, speaking of the relevance of contributions to the discussion.
What say you, is it better to get offended based on speculation or to ask the original poster what he meant?
I have a pretty good sense of humor, but occasionally, I grow weary of all the folks just waiting for someone to knock the chip off their shoulders.
TB
Saving my energy and rage for real problems.
