Contour Enthusiasts Group Archives Forums General Dyno and Drag sorry guys

Originally posted by fordistrash:

---

except for certian classic cars from ths sixtys fords lick the male lower extremity. the GT40 was and still is an excellent automobile, and anything shelby touched are of course great cars. These days the only thing which ford makes that remotly resembles a drag car is the mustang and that cant touch a camaro. I know you are all going to tell me "well.. mustang special vehicle teams has a car with an engine that i dont know how it works has this and that bolted to it, i dont know what any of them are or how they work, but it has 390 or 400 somthing HP(whatever that is) and it can beat a camaro" if you want to talk limited production suck on the '99 ZL1 it comes with a 572c.i.(thats 9.3L for losers) V8 with 770 HP and un imaginable torque runs from 0 to 60 in 2.7 seconds and gets a 10.4 in the 1/4. So pease get your family, soccor mom, almost mini van, grocery getters off of the track.

---

On behalf of the CEG...

Let me be that last of many to say: "Go the F*ck away! F*in troll!"

There's a few cars around here pushing the same power as a camaro ss and seeing as how YOU DON'T HAVE ONE then there are even more who could school you in a race.

warmonger

have u ever heard of a 10L boss mustang.

598 cu in. 10L V8
850hp
800tq
0-60 1.9s
10.xx s 1/4 time


btw, i love the poster of the camaro that says "30 years of total domination"......yet were gonna drop the car.

that boss sounds excellent, never heard of it before , but it sounds pretty sweet. I never dissed contours as a family car i just dont see them on the track. As to the supra twin turbo kicking a camaro's ass: try a twin turbo on the camero see what happens. Once again i see the IQ from some of you shooting through the roof(heavy sarcasm implied) try making a point, it doesnt take any intellegence to diss someone with different views as you. Raising a little mayhem is a good way to learn things you dont know (i.e. i didnt know about that boss mustang nor was i aware that shelby wasnt always with ford, altough i think he always used thier powerplants). To address the break in production of camaro. Mustang is mainly sustained by chicks who think they are cute and dont care if it is the pos v6 auto (i think we can all agree that a pony car like mustang or camaro sucks with a v6 auto). I will give ford one thing, they offer many different models with lots of different options so they have somthing for everyone, good marketing. Despite that i am not a big fan of their vehicles...

There is a chevy with a 350 that was equiped with twin turbos, callaway made it and it went 254.1 mph. Niether Ferrari nor Porche could beat it in an all out top speed contest and that was 1989... supra cant touch that

Originally posted by fordistrash:

---

that boss sounds excellent, never heard of it before , but it sounds pretty sweet. i didnt know about that boss mustang nor was i aware that shelby wasnt always with ford, altough i think he always used thier powerplants).

---

I see you too show your IQ.... so all those shelby dodge cars used ford motors???? now that's an interseting thing...
I would of thought that the dodge viper which shelby helped with used a dodge motor not a ford one.... but hey you are the all knowing car god so tell us how it is

ooh and if you care to find out more about the 10L boss mustag try going on to fords SVT site and click on the concept lab....

Originally posted by fordistrash:

---

There is a chevy with a 350 that was equiped with twin turbos, callaway made it and it went 254.1 mph. Niether Ferrari nor Porche could beat it in an all out top speed contest and that was 1989... supra cant touch that

---

Do you really believe this engine used anything that came out of a GM owned factory? It used an aftermarket block, aftermarket heads, custom intake manifold, aftermarket crank, rods, pistons, waterpump, oil system, valvetrain etc. Even the bolts holding the alternator on were probably aftermarket. The only reason they call it a small block chevy is because the bore spacing and the cylinder head bolt pattern are the same as small block chevy.

What were the displacements of the Porsche and the Ferrari in this competition? I'm guessing 3.2L (195 cu. in.) for the Porsche, and the F40's 2.9L (177 cu. in) for the Ferrari. So basically a "no holds barred" Chevy engine was able to make more power than two other "no holds barred" engines that were approximately half the size of the Chevy engine. Wow, there's a shocker.

If Porsche or Ferrari wanted to beat Chevy in those competitions, they would have had no problem. When's the last time GM won a Formula 1 title? It wasn't Porsche and Ferrari and Chevy in that competition, it was aftermarket companies.

You have yet to state one good point in your argument. Basically all you've proven is that there is good aftermarket support for one engine GM makes. Please just give up now and move on to the next forum you want to antagonize.

Bob

The Camaro (in any factory produced model) couldn't compete with a Ford Mclaren F1 (from the factory the world's fastest car).
Hell, even the new Vette can't compete with it.
The F1 might be expensive, but it was a factory produced Ford car.

Originally posted by Sleeper:

---

The Camaro (in any factory produced model) couldn't compete with a Ford Mclaren F1 (from the factory the world's fastest car).
Hell, even the new Vette can't compete with it.
The F1 might be expensive, but it was a factory produced Ford car.

---

What?? Not to come to the rescue of this camaro clown, but i have to ask... What is a Ford McLaren F1?

-Mark

Yeah, if I'm not mistaken, the McLaren F1 uses a BMW powerplant.

Either way, this is turning into a catfight consisting of "I know this one brand car that can beat this other brand car." LAME.

Listen, Fordistrash, if you want to hang around and learn something, please feel free to do so (but you should change your name ). If you wanna bash our cars, ideas, and members, please leave.