Originally posted by Rara:
Keep in mind, were have been speaking of a single, hypothetical system, not modifying the system during the time of discussion, unless otherwise noted.


Yes, I know you weren't talking of modifying any one system, but the original post was about performance vs. money in a way. I was putting them on a more level playing field funds-wise.

Originally posted by Rara:
As far as efficiency goes, turbo has it hands down though, a supercharger loses far more through drive losses than a turbo does through increased exhaust restriction (especially compared to a typical stock exhaust system)


But only if you have enough space to get rid of the extra heat generated by the exhaust restrictions on the turbo system. I am of course, speaking of the exhaust side heat, not the compressed air heat which both create.

Or, to put it in nyceboi terms... Heat's bad, mmmmmmk?


http://www.bnmotorsports.com "And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my CEG brothers. And you will know I am the Moderator when I lay my vengeance upon you."