Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
#407488 03/02/02 04:46 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 5,805
T
Member
Offline
Member
T
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 5,805
The 'Profile' concept car(based on CDW27) had a Rootes style Eaton blower and the initial set up had the same probs as Vortec re driveshaft etc.It was mounted above the trans and picked up on the the same intake manifold position as stoc...but did have a large intercooler...!!
wink


V6 MTX
'Don't p**s up my back then tell me it's raining!!!"
'Its only nuts & bolts!'
'If I build it,fix it,upgrade it or modify it...MAYBE they will come....!
Haines Motor Sports Inc,
Dealer for 'Quaife America' & 'Autotech Sport Tuning'
SOLE USA Dealer for the American Axle 'AUSSIE BAR'...
Get a Turbo for you Zetec from HMS Inc...by 'The Demon' ...www.DemonDynamics.co.uk
..don't talk about it DO IT !!!
#407489 03/03/02 02:45 AM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 443
R
Member
Offline
Member
R
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 443
Quote:
Originally posted by Rara:
the new Cobra uses an M112 (same basic blower as the lightning, which is what RedSVT has, as there is no way he has the Cobra specific one), and this would be far too large for a Duratech anyway, an M90 would be far more appropriate, one from an older T-bird supercoupe could prolly be adapted. It has been done before, even by ford, though only on Concept vehicles, IIRC the older Profile concept had an eaton blower on it (ask Terry, he would know about this car) snd the more recent cougar eliminator (trick setup on this car) had one as well.
Your right Rara the m112's are what I have, as well as the M90's and the M45's. The M90 would be my choice for the SVT as well. The install I am looking into does not mount on the intake or beside a head nor does it mount anywhere that it will need a jackshaft. There will be no jackshaft! You can also produce as much as 22 lbs. of boost with one properly set up. The hardest part of the install will be the ECU work, and since Ford has done it before and is doing it right now it can be done. wink

#407490 03/03/02 02:56 AM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 443
R
Member
Offline
Member
R
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 443
Quote:
Originally posted by woz:
Last year my buddy SC/ed his integra with a Eaton SC and just for kicks I tried to find a mount point for the unit all over engine bay. (eaton m90?? in hand) It almost felt like tetris geting the damn thing to fit in my contour.. Needless to say there is no room in any place that I could think of it working. (or find) The only way to do it is with a shaft like the vort kit or Turbo. There is just no room for the belt that the eaton roots needs. From what it sounld's like the turbo may be the way to go.

FYI: By the time he was done it cost about 4,000 to do it correctly injectors, smaller pullys, ex..ex.. + tons of tuning time and only putting down 180 t/ 220/h to front wheels and that is with a correctly built jackson kit @ 12+ psi. But then, on a light integra it's a monster.
Thats to bad about your buddies SC install. He should have gotten a kit from Endyn, there cheaper and from the sound of it create far more performance than he got. wink

#407491 03/11/02 03:20 PM
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 83
W
woz Offline
Member
Offline
Member
W
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 83
Jusk to keep the facts in line smile also the owner of the intrgra in question wanted me to post the below comments laugh

[/QUOTE]Thats to bad about your buddies SC install. He should have gotten a kit from Endyn, there cheaper and from the sound of it create far more performance than he got. wink [/QB][/QUOTE]

That would be nice except that ...

(a) there is no such thing as the Endyn supercharger. There's only one, hand built prototype in existence, on a 1989 Civic si 1.5 SOHC. It's a monster though.

(b) cheap is relative. All the bits n pieces to support a 400+ whp FWD car safely will easily run you $15K (trans, brakes, suspension, etc).

(c) some other dood on the Forced Induction Integra board sent his entire engine + Jackson supercharger to Endyn to build it to hell (forged pistons, pNp head, Eagle rods, reworked Eaton SC, etc. Long story short: At 17 psi and $10K later, it barely runs better than it did at 11 psi.


Woz
2000 Contour SVT #136
Black with Blue leather
30% Window tint all around
PS: I hate my Ford Dealer
#407492 03/11/02 06:17 PM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,682
B
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,682
don't even think about running an eaton without an intercooler... you might be able to get away with running the kenne bell twin screw blower for the escape (sans the intercooler) with low boost (twin screw run cooler then roots, giving more hp at the same boost level) the only data i saw to prove this was provided in a test "sponsered" by kenne bell, and was probably slightly "skewed". the kenne bell kits are fairly resonable, and the cost of the extra r&d would still keep it below what the turbo kit is going to run u. i think this would be cool for someone to try.

lol 151cube engine with a 112cube eaton... there is a guy with a "eaton takeoff" that is 160cubes.... lol the blower would have more displacement then the engine... hehe...

i think the m90 would even be a bit much for the duratech... maybe the m62 would be more appropriate...


i am offically a troll... so take my information and advice with a grain of salt.

08/15/2001 - 11/05/2001 : 1999 Ford Contour SVT : 170fwhp - 147.9 fwtq
07/17/2001 - __/__/____ : 2001 Roush Mustang GT Stage 1
11/05/2001 - __/__/____ : 2001 Ford F-150 SVT Lightning
#407493 03/11/02 06:38 PM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,481
I
Member
Offline
Member
I
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,481
Quote:
Originally posted by bret:
don't even think about running an eaton without an intercooler... you might be able to get away with running the kenne bell twin screw blower for the escape (sans the intercooler) with low boost (twin screw run cooler then roots, giving more hp at the same boost level) the only data i saw to prove this was provided in a test "sponsered" by kenne bell, and was probably slightly "skewed". the kenne bell kits are fairly resonable, and the cost of the extra r&d would still keep it below what the turbo kit is going to run u. i think this would be cool for someone to try.

lol 151cube engine with a 112cube eaton... there is a guy with a "eaton takeoff" that is 160cubes.... lol the blower would have more displacement then the engine... hehe...

i think the m90 would even be a bit much for the duratech... maybe the m62 would be more appropriate...
i am offically a troll... so take my information and advice with a grain of salt.

I'll take your OWN word of advice on this one Bret. :p laugh


99 Range Rover 4.6 HSE
Mystery Car??????
#407494 03/11/02 07:13 PM
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,794
J
Member
Offline
Member
J
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,794
What is the diff between an Eaton unit and the one by Kenne Bell?


Just call me Judge.
People suck.
Life begins at 170mph...until that point it is just boring.....
#407495 03/11/02 09:55 PM
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,682
B
Member
Offline
Member
B
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,682
i can't find that temp article... but here is something i found on the web...

"Screw type superchargers are derived from the Roots type concept but with vast improvements for street use. Although from the out side, screw type superchargers may look a lot like Roots type superchargers, on the inside you will find a twin-screw design that compresses air unlike Roots type superchargers which pump the air into the motor. Screw type superchargers have an axial-flow design that compresses the air as it moves between the screws to create positive pressure without creating the heat that Roots type superchargers can create. The Screw type supercharger's ability to produce a dramatic increase of power from idle and through out the rest of the power curve make them a great choice for heavy vehicles, towing or commercial use. "


i am offically a troll... so take my information and advice with a grain of salt.

08/15/2001 - 11/05/2001 : 1999 Ford Contour SVT : 170fwhp - 147.9 fwtq
07/17/2001 - __/__/____ : 2001 Roush Mustang GT Stage 1
11/05/2001 - __/__/____ : 2001 Ford F-150 SVT Lightning
#407496 03/11/02 09:58 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,527
R
Administrator
Offline
Administrator
R
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,527
Quote:
Originally posted by 1Sick_Puppy:
What is the diff between an Eaton unit and the one by Kenne Bell?
not a whole lot in concept, the lobes on the kenne bell blowers are "twisted" more to make it more like a screw, hence the nick of "screw-type"

I have seen some empirical evidence that the units Kenne bell uses are a bit more efficient than a comparable size eaton, but I have yet to run across any indisputable test results. On the plus side for eaton, they have a rock solid reputation for durability.


It's all about balance.

bcphillips@peoplepc.com
#407497 03/11/02 11:40 PM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,527
R
Administrator
Offline
Administrator
R
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,527
no offense bret, but Muscle Mustangs and Fast Fords is hardly an ideal source for technical information, lol.

fwiw, the lobes on the modern eaton blowers are also "twisted" to be more screw-like, though not to the extent of the ones that kenne bell uses.


It's all about balance.

bcphillips@peoplepc.com
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5