To start off, I think that a Lysholm (twin screw)type s/c would make better sense over the eaton, do to a more efficient design.
I'm wondering why you would need a intercooler w/the lysholm (sp?) type supercharger? Kenne Bell claims they don't need one on the mustangs do to better efficiency which translates into less heat. I'm not saying it isn't needed, just that it might not be essential.
Next up, I think the best place would be to set it in the the valley of the engine w/a new designed (fabricated) lower intake if possible.
I have been toying w/this subject in my head for awhile now. Somewhere down the road i'm going to find a lower intake in a wrecking yard and see what kind of work would need to be done and then talk to a shop in the area that produces Chevy intakes for the twin screw s/c. They might be able to produce something for me.
BTW, Brothers Performance wherehouse sold a kit (eaton based)for the Mustang that sat on the passanger side of the engine. I believe they called it the instacharger. So it is possible, just not probable in this situation.
