Forums Calendar Active Threads
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: 3 liter intake (upper)
#403874 03/03/02 02:53 AM
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 341
Charlotte, Mich
Y
Yankeyspeed Offline OP
Member
OP Offline
Yankeyspeed
Member
Y
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 341
Charlotte, Mich
Hmm I like the idea of a scoop. I can live with that. It could help pull the heat out as well.

As to Warmongers question. I have 170 hp 2.5 so yeah its a good upgrade. And there is no substitution for cubic inches. laugh

Yankeyspeed: American power and ingenuity
95 SE -Stock enough
Yeah my car has a baby seat, its still fast.
Re: 3 liter intake (upper)
#403875 03/03/02 03:12 PM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,050
Tucson AZ
W
warmonger Offline
Member
Offline
warmonger
Member
W
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,050
Tucson AZ
That was a Rhetorical question, and meant for the SVT owner. wink

However, you are correct. No matter which combination you drop in you will be happy. However, if you know now whether you want forced induction or not, then you can make some better choices. If no forced induction is in your future, then using your 2.5L setup with appropriate preparation with the bigger block will give the higher compression.

warmonger

You can call me anything you like as long as it's nice.(all lies accepted)
99 Silver Frost SVT. #226 of 2760
Engine: 3.0 power!
Unique Stuff: Sunroof control module (#1 of 9)
Car Audio: Loaded and loud!
Check them out at
http://home.earthlink.net/~twilson1726
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  bnoon_dup1, PA 3L SVT_dup1 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Rules · Mark All Read Contact Us · Forum Help · Contour Enthusiasts Group Archives
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5