Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...
Wouldn't my own child be prohibited from saying "under God"?
I honestly think this whole thing is ridiculous. Newdow claims that his daughter is injured when she's compelled to watch and listen to her classmates in a ritual proclaiming a God.
These arguments can go back and forth all day long and it's great to see everyone's thoughts.
"Compelling students to recite the Pledge was held to be a First Amendment violation in West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 642 (1943) (?[T]he action of the local authorities in compelling the flag salute and pledge transcends constitutional limitations on their power and invades the sphere of intellect and spirit which it is the purpose of the First Amendment to our Constitution to reserve from all official control.?). Barnette was decided before the 1954 Act added the words ?under God? to the Pledge."
"If as Barnette holds no state may require anyone to recite the Pledge, and if as the prayer cases hold the recitation by a teacher or rabbi of unwelcome words is coercion, then the Pledge of Allegiance becomes unconstitutional under all circumstances, just as no school may read from a holy scripture at the start of class."
By the time my daughter is old enough to go to school, no one will be able to tell her to say anything.
