Obviously you can only believe in one or the other, but no[o]t both.
Science is not a matter of "belief". Science is taking the available evidence and verifying its integrity; analyzing the evidence using the scientific method; and then having others repeat the same steps. A good scientist will tell you that the evidence supports a particular theory and will not proclaim "belief" as the sole criterion for holding a given view. A theist will most vapidly banter about the notion of "belief" without realizing that "belief" in and of itself does little to support a claim. The act of "believing" will not guarantee that a given claim more readily models the phenomonology of the cosmos than a hypothesis which has withstood the "trial by fire" of the scientific method.
I can tell you that I "believe" in the existence of ghostly subatomic particles known as neutrinos or I can present data that I collected from the Super-Kamiokande neutrino detector in Japan that suggests the existence of neutrinos. Draw your conclusions from there.
Move only if there is a real advantage to be gained...when you move, fall like a thunderbolt.
-Sun Tzu, The Art of War
'98 SVT E0 Superchip Y-pipe KKM filter custom 2.5 cat back exhaust UDP linux fish
