Originally posted by cpurser:
[QUOTE]There lies the problem: What I believe is evidence of God may not be accepted by you. For example: the complexity of the human body, the harmony of the earth's ecosystem, the complexity of the universe, miracles performed by Jesus Christ - these points, I believe, is evidence of God. However, a non-believer would say that these points are not evidence of God, but, they were caused by the Big Bang, pure chance, Evolution, or whatever.
How can science prove how something DIDN'T happen if it can't prove how it did happen?
And please, let's not get into a debate on Evolution/Big Bang. This has already been done, and it lasted 15+ pages with no resolution.
I'll start with agreeing with you about 2 things.
1) Big Bang theory sucks, I don't believe it.
2) People perception of evidence and whether to accept it on not is the barrier between the two sides.
My take,
Jesus did exist, but did not perform the miracles that are in the bible. Because there are no proof that they actually happened.
I believe the complexity of the human body is due to the fact that nature can adapt.
Balance of the eco-sytem, again nature. The planet couldn't have made it this long unless it adapted into a nice balance.
Speaking of nature, the bible makes no mention of dinosaurs, yet they existed. How could God have over looked telling his prophets of these large beast.
If the first two people were Adam & Eve (white people) then how did we get all the diffent ethnic groups around the world.
Stupid questions I know, but one's the bible cannot answer.
