|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,053
Member
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 1,053 |
I'll stick up for ya Sandman even though you do a good job of sticking up for yourself.
'98 Mystique LS V6 MTX
"Unprofessional driver, wide open course." #9 - Hitting .400 for ever "Wake up the damn Bambino; I'll drill him in the ass." -- Pedro Martinez "The MTX75 was not designed to be a drag racing transmission" -- Terry Haines
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,461
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,461 |
Lawyers--another profession that has a bad public image. That one is richly deserved, however... Brian Originally posted by Sandman333: the vast majority of it is due to frivilous lawsuits that are allowed to proceed against
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,847
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,847 |
"When I take action, I'm not going to fire a $2 million missile at a $10 empty tent and hit a camel in the butt. It's going to be decisive." - President George W. Bush
95 Contour SE ATX V6 "Cracked" Secondaries DMD Installed SVT Brakes
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,961
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,961 |
Since I have been told by police officers that they were trained with the expectation that they were to adhere to a higher standard of conduct than what the ordinary citizen needs to as a part of duty, I consider your opinion to be status quo with that police officers are currently trained to do, if not part of everyday practice. I do agree with you on this point, status quo or not.
However, I do think you give too much benefit of the doubt that the officer has an emergency when they are taking liberties with traffic laws. Citizens may be too quick to state it is unnecessary, but I think (and neither of us have proof) that far more of these incidents are nonemergencies than you are giving responsibility for. Considering the percentage that I have seen from point of liberty to destination, the majority are clearly non-emergency situations, and the police were not called to the location. Your area may be different, and I applaud your officers and management for a better standard than exists here.
I actually not only read the thread about the IL law regarding secret compartments, but I was an active participant. It was a complete defense of status quo saying that the legislature, police, and courts did exactly what should be done, even though the wording has considerable excess latitude in it. I saw no criticism or plan for improvement stated by you for the law or anyone involved in the process of it in any of your statements. This is a poor example of stating that you have forwarded ideas based on bettering the justice system. It actually proves my point of a wholesale defense of whatever procedure is implemented by the police.
I'm not saying I drive to the law all the time, as a good number of traffic laws are ridiculous. However, as you said before, cops should be held to a higher standard than they enforce.
I agree that the police have the responsibility to protect the public. However, this does not mean that the protection should be at the sole discretion of the police. I am not saying that public opinion is the only guiding force. You are polarizing my statements into black and white, which is not how the world or my philosophy works. However, if there is widespread dissatisfaction with a behavior, it is time to create a new one which isn't as offensive to the public while retaining the ability to protect. Also, if you think these dissatisfactions are only small minorities, you are sadly mistaken. I hear these opinions far and wide across demographics and interests. Maybe they never get to the ears of the police, or they are dismissed at that level as a small minority, but the traffic liberties dissatisfaction isn't limited to small minorities.
"Current procedure works" is about the worst excuse I know of for not seeking improvement. I am not for change for the sake of change, never have been. However, just because a procedure works well does not mean a procedure cannot be made which works better. That is what I expect of myself and others, a vision for making things better than just just defending and explaining the current procedures.
You may be a citizen just like the next Joe. However, we all see the world through lenses. No matter where you are, on duty or not, you are still seeing through lenses tinted by being a police officer. You are asking us to try looking at the world through the tint of a police officer, I am asking you to try looking at the world through the tint of a non-police officer.
You can pillage an enemy once, but a customer is an endless resource.
James Oerichbauer - PFPC Global Fund Services
Ross: 1998 E0 SVT Contour, Toreador Red, Konis, Superchip, KKM w/heat shield, SHO-shop y-pipe and rear strut brace, no res, ScotchCal, Moda Sport 16x7.5 wheels with 205/55ZR16 Dayton Dayton tires... more
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,461
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,461 |
I believe the stat for business is that only 10% of customers who are not happy with the service/product will complain. Put another way, for every customer who complains about something, there are 9 more who were not happy but did not complain. I suspect the figure for police-related complaints is *much* lower than 10% due to the percieved threat of retribution for making a complaint, and the likelyhood of a particular complaint being addressed in an effective manner also lower (since it's the government). Private industry that fails to address customer complaints sees lower profit margins and ultimately goes out of business. Government, on the other hand, just gets larger and more expensive as politicians like "tricky dick" gephardt use scare tactics in order to justify tax increases. In summary, I'm saying that police departments are not immune from the same problems that can plague any government operation. Brian Originally posted by svtcarboy: Also, if you think these dissatisfactions are only small minorities, you are sadly mistaken. I hear these opinions far and wide across demographics and interests. Maybe they never get to the ears of the police, or they are dismissed at that level as a small minority, but the traffic liberties dissatisfaction isn't limited to small minorities.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,445
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,445 |
Originally posted by qaz:
So this got me to wondering...
1)What sort of stereotypes/opinions do you suppose members of the general public who are treated to this sort of behavior from cops might form about cops?
2)Is there an overall negative impession of cops, and does behavior like this contribute to that impression?
3)Was this cop hoping I'll speed up so he can give me a ticket?
4)Was he actually trying to get somewhere in a legitimate hurry (such as responding to a call), and if so, why the hell did he tailgate me instead of passing at the earliest possible opportunity? Alternatively, if he was not responding to a call and merely in a hurry, why did he not wait until there was a passing zone?
5)Do cops realize that when they wear the uniform and drive the car, they are held to higher standards of conduct and behavior by the general public?
Brian 1....far as im concerned if he's passing me up he's not messing with me...have a good day officer 2....doesn't bother me...i drive bad so y shouldn't he 3....nope if he wanted to give u a ticket he would have done so because u were already over the limit 4....most likely he was in a hurry somewhere....im regularly on the 5 fwy here for 100 miles or so both ways and often see local police from all over highway patrol and sherrif....usually they arent worried about pulling anyway over they are usually on a journey that often has them on the freeway for a good portion of my drive some drive like everyone else...hop in the fast lane or carpool and hit the cruise control...others drive like a bat out of hell like the guy u that ran up on u just last week when i got on the freeway there was a local officer from where i dont remember but he was in the fast lane tailgating someone in a kinda old truck...(when a cop is minding his own business and he's on your ass move over!!!) anyway he was held at around 65-70 mph ...and i was just merging on a gradually let my speed pick up to where i passed and then left behind the officer til i was able to give a enough gas to comfortably get him out of sight another great thing about the contour...stealth bomber
95 contour se...dark blue...monsterflow air filter...remanuf atx...wiring harness recall or bust!!!96k miles...motorcraft awsf32pp plugs & red ford racing 9mm wires...kvr black plated cross-drilled rotors & carbon fiber pads...currently undergoing renovation...excuse our dust!!! are my dodgers for real????
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,461
Member
|
OP
Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,461 |
I don't think a speeding ticket for 55MPH in a 50MPH zone is gonna go over real well with the judge...so no, I do not think the officer was gonna pull me over for going 5 over.
Brian
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,444
Member
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,444 |
one thing i wanted to add re: the doctor, lawyer,plumber comparison is police officers work on the SAME streets as the people they protect. i don't have to ever step into a lawyers office or doctors office in my lifetime,if i don't want. They might get professional training for their practice, but thats irrelevant to me if i never step foot in their office. so the comparison may be ok, its not a perfect comparison.
...and yes, I did SEARCH first before asking.
AIM:omegazodiac
95 gl 99 contour svt #1750/2760 built 4/6/99 black/tan plates, not personalized (###-REV) amsoil series 2000 oil & filter~amsoil tranny fluid cocktail~tint: 35% windshield/front doors,20% rear window/rear doors~black oval/rear strip~nyceboi rear emblem~aussie grills~hella led sidemarkers~piaa superwhite low's~piaa extreme reverse lights~door dingless (knauberized)~hood liner removed~black '95 sail panels~trunk cargo net~mondeo hood struts~ford racing red 9mm wires~autolite double plat plugs~jensen hu~recontented dash clock(it rocks)~clifford ag4 security
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,847
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,847 |
Originally posted by svtcarboy: Since I have been told by police officers that they were trained with the expectation that they were to adhere to a higher standard of conduct than what the ordinary citizen needs to as a part of duty, I consider your opinion to be status quo with that police officers are currently trained to do, if not part of everyday practice. I do agree with you on this point, status quo or not.
However, I do think you give too much benefit of the doubt that the officer has an emergency when they are taking liberties with traffic laws.
And I think that you assume, with no knowledge of the situation, far too often that the officer is not in fact involved in a search, etc....
Citizens may be too quick to state it is unnecessary, but I think (and neither of us have proof) that far more of these incidents are nonemergencies than you are giving responsibility for.
Again, your assumption.
Considering the percentage that I have seen from point of liberty to destination, the majority are clearly non-emergency situations, and the police were not called to the location. Your area may be different, and I applaud your officers and management for a better standard than exists here.
Again, I also never said that breaking traffic laws for convienence was acceptable.
I actually not only read the thread about the IL law regarding secret compartments, but I was an active participant. It was a complete defense of status quo saying that the legislature, police, and courts did exactly what should be done, even though the wording has considerable excess latitude in it. I saw no criticism or plan for improvement stated by you for the law or anyone involved in the process of it in any of your statements.
Because, IMO, none is necessarry. My point about that thread is that my arguements were well thought out, and consisted of my opinions. Apparently, you have a problem with accepting the fact that some people agree with certain laws, especially when you don't. Further, it is apparently your position that if you do not agree with a law, and whoever you are debating with does, that person must not be "thinking for themselves", rather they are simply regurgitating what they have been taught. Rather self-centered of you.
This is a poor example of stating that you have forwarded ideas based on bettering the justice system. It actually proves my point of a wholesale defense of whatever procedure is implemented by the police.
No, it proved mine, as stated above.
I'm not saying I drive to the law all the time, as a good number of traffic laws are ridiculous. However, as you said before, cops should be held to a higher standard than they enforce.
And so the cause for your animosity toward the police is revealed. Wondered when we would get around to that. YOU selectively obey the traffic laws that YOU deem worthy, and as such YOU probably believe that YOU have been unfairly ticketed, convicted, and fined. Well, life is about more than just YOU. Traffic laws are there for your safety and the safety of others around you. YOU have a responsibility to obey all traffic laws, whether or not YOU agree with them.
I agree that the police have the responsibility to protect the public. However, this does not mean that the protection should be at the sole discretion of the police.
Never said it was.
I am not saying that public opinion is the only guiding force. You are polarizing my statements into black and white, which is not how the world or my philosophy works. However, if there is widespread dissatisfaction with a behavior, it is time to create a new one which isn't as offensive to the public while retaining the ability to protect.
Mighty big IF, and I don't see it. In all my years in Law Enforcement, I have yet to have a citizen complain about my driving habits.
Also, if you think these dissatisfactions are only small minorities, you are sadly mistaken. I hear these opinions far and wide across demographics and interests. Maybe they never get to the ears of the police, or they are dismissed at that level as a small minority, but the traffic liberties dissatisfaction isn't limited to small minorities.
I think this depends highly on the company you keep.
"Current procedure works" is about the worst excuse I know of for not seeking improvement. I am not for change for the sake of change, never have been. However, just because a procedure works well does not mean a procedure cannot be made which works better. That is what I expect of myself and others, a vision for making things better than just just defending and explaining the current procedures.
And you and a select few on here are trying to forward a "blanket policy" on when officers may disobey traffic laws. Take it from someone who has experience, blanket policies do not work. What you fail to realize is that the world in which we work is far too dynamic for that. So, stating that every time an officer needs to go through a red light, exceed the speed limit, whatever, that they should have their lights/siren on is ludicrous, especially coming from someone who does not do this job every day.
You may be a citizen just like the next Joe. However, we all see the world through lenses. No matter where you are, on duty or not, you are still seeing through lenses tinted by being a police officer. You are asking us to try looking at the world through the tint of a police officer, I am asking you to try looking at the world through the tint of a non-police officer. Yes, and I think I've figured out just how dark yours are tinted.
"When I take action, I'm not going to fire a $2 million missile at a $10 empty tent and hit a camel in the butt. It's going to be decisive." - President George W. Bush
95 Contour SE ATX V6 "Cracked" Secondaries DMD Installed SVT Brakes
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,847
Member
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,847 |
Originally posted by qaz: I believe the stat for business is that only 10% of customers who are not happy with the service/product will complain. Put another way, for every customer who complains about something, there are 9 more who were not happy but did not complain.
I suspect the figure for police-related complaints is *much* lower than 10% due to the percieved threat of retribution for making a complaint, and the likelyhood of a particular complaint being addressed in an effective manner also lower (since it's the government).
This is meaningless until you can quote a case study. I could state that I suspect it is much higher since people like to complain about Government.
Private industry that fails to address customer complaints sees lower profit margins and ultimately goes out of business.
Government, on the other hand, just gets larger and more expensive as politicians like "tricky dick" gephardt use scare tactics in order to justify tax increases.
Don't drag politics into this, it has no place in this thread.
In summary, I'm saying that police departments are not immune from the same problems that can plague any government operation.
Brian
"When I take action, I'm not going to fire a $2 million missile at a $10 empty tent and hit a camel in the butt. It's going to be decisive." - President George W. Bush
95 Contour SE ATX V6 "Cracked" Secondaries DMD Installed SVT Brakes
|
|
|
|
|