here's how the conversation would of started had it been ghettofied
Being uh Christian, da argument o' Creation vs. Evolution iz very intriguing. The evolutionists believe dat da Biblical account o' Creation iz wrong an' da Christians believe dat da Theory o' Evolution iz wrong. So who iz right? There iz arguments fo' each account o' how life began. The evolutionist believe da earth iz millions o' years old an' da Christians believe da earth iz only thousands o' years old. Again, who iz right?
In addition ta being uh Christian, I be also an Engineer an' I truly enjoy science an' logical thinking. However I be not uh scientist. I do not pretend ta know everything about da theory o' evolution an' physics. But I gots come across some very pimp-tight arguments against evolution (given by Dr. Kent Hovind) dat I Wants ta discuss in dis here forum, since dere iz some very pimp-tight debaters here (namely EdwardC) dat obviously know uh great deal about science.
So fo' our mutual edification, I Wants ta ax some questions (one at uh tyme o' course) so dat every one can see both sides o' da story. Again, I don' claim ta gots all o' da answers which iz why I don' wants dis here ta become uh heated debate, just uh pimp-tight discussion so dat both points o' view can be heard. With dat being said, queshun number one:
1) How do evolutionists prove da earth iz millions o' years old? ya'll is mad stupid.
