.. my best defense is how your going to explain to me all the scientific evidence that exists in every natural museum in a complete and scientific manner. NOT using references from the bible for generic terms like Behemoth, but exacting studies that go beyond the Bible and use other methods to correlate the data contained therein.
I have been wanting to ask someone about this very thing. Are the fossils that are found actually complete ? Are they even half complete ? When you read the fine print on the museum table in front of a lot of fossil proof for evolution, usually there are only a few fossils (1 or 2, maybe 3 ) and the rest is an artists interpretation, or a reconstruction of what they think it looked like. Are there any interesting complete works that can be viewed ?
One of the most recent T-rex fossil discoveries is OVER 90% of an adult animal. [some of the tail is missing] It was found, as most T-rex are, in Montana. It's funny, it was actually on the discovery channel last night. The big bone of contention is not IF T-rex existed, but rather if he was a predator, or a scavenger. Facinating discussions from top scientists in the field. Just thought I'd share
blk.99svt n.e.Ohio Never under estimate the power of stupid people in large groups...
is not IF T-rex existed, but rather if he was a predator, or a scavenger. Facinating discussions from top scientists in the field. Just thought I'd share 
