|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,692
Member
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,692 |
Originally posted by Paul Kienitz:
I'll be lucky if I ever get under 18. if hector can get under a 18 anyone can.... well MOST of the time he gets under a 18.... Right hector  I OW3N PAGE three 
Joe Hartley "yes I know it's a MTX Zetec but it beats having a ATX Duratec" Champagne 96 GL MTX some mods dynoed at 114.2whp and 124.4wtq (pre CTA intake) 16.858 @ 80.76mph (yes it's slow but still faster than D Davis) AIM: ZetecRacing My Site My Profile
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,950
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,950 |
Originally posted by ZetecRacing: Originally posted by Paul Kienitz:
[b]I'll be lucky if I ever get under 18.
I OW3N PAGE three [/b]King?! Don't make me laugh. You ran a 16.8 twice and your king? :rolleyes: You run consistent 17's, a 17.1 here and mostly 17.4s which is two tenths of a second faster than me. And remember it is an ATX.  I will be passing you up in the future by my slow, VCT having, doesn't respond well to mods ATX. :p I still have a few tricks up my sleeve and it doesn't involve bottle feeding my baby.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,692
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,692 |
Originally posted by LoCo: King?! Don't make me laugh. You ran a 16.8 twice and your king? :rolleyes: You run consistent 17's, a 17.1 here and mostly 17.4s which is two tenths of a second faster than me. And remember it is an ATX. UMMM lets see here I only have ran this year slower than a 17.2 when I missed 2nd gear against mike.... please check your facts next time little boy. OOH and I too have a few more things to do to my car too and you know I'm against the bottle route.... and no not a turbo either... yet that is and the run down of ever time I have gotten this year... 16.858 17.063 17.010 17.182 17.114 17.199 17.173 17.678 OOPs missed 2nd 17.049 16.877 HUMMMMM sure looks like I'm a consistant 17.4 runner.... too bad missing a gear I still get as good as a time as you can when you run correctly... truth hurts doesn't it. and yes you do have a ATX with a header and a superchip that I don't have....
Joe Hartley "yes I know it's a MTX Zetec but it beats having a ATX Duratec" Champagne 96 GL MTX some mods dynoed at 114.2whp and 124.4wtq (pre CTA intake) 16.858 @ 80.76mph (yes it's slow but still faster than D Davis) AIM: ZetecRacing My Site My Profile
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,950
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,950 |
Originally posted by ZetecRacing: Originally posted by LoCo: [b]King?! Don't make me laugh. You ran a 16.8 twice and your king? :rolleyes: You run consistent 17's, a 17.1 here and mostly 17.4s which is two tenths of a second faster than me. And remember it is an ATX.
OOH and I too have a few more things to do to my car too and you know I'm against the bottle route.... and no not a turbo either... yet that is
and the run down of ever time I have gotten this year...
16.858
17.063
17.010
17.182
17.114
17.199
17.173
17.678
17.049
16.877
HUMMMMM sure looks like I'm a consistant 17.4 runner....
too bad missing a gear I still get as good as a time as you can when you run correctly... truth hurts doesn't it.
and yes you do have a ATX with a header and a superchip that I don't have....[/b]Oh NO! I'm a bad LITTLE BOY. :rolleyes: Don't get mad because an ATX is catching up to your "fast" MTX. Let's say 17.2 consistenly. That is if you can shift. :rolleyes: You should know the chip doesn't do sh*t for HP only shifting. But it shifts slow. I don't have to justify what I do to my car. I was the one that tried the make the header work, and it does. I didn't just talk and talk about it like some people. So if I get the SC to work is that cheating? Or is every route other than N/A cheating when it comes to beating your kingly time of 16.8? If you look at my car I am going for a balance of speed and looks. If you really want me to scrap the whole looks side we will see who comes out with the better times. :rolleyes:
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,950
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,950 |
Originally posted by ZetecRacing: Originally posted by LoCo: [b]Oh NO! I'm a bad LITTLE BOY. :rolleyes: Don't get mad because an ATX is catching up to your "fast" MTX. Let's say 17.2 consistenly. That is if you can shift. :rolleyes: You should know the chip doesn't do sh*t for HP only shifting. But it shifts slow. I don't have to justify what I do to my car. I was the one that tried the make the header work, and it does. I didn't just talk and talk about it like some people. So if I get the SC to work is that cheating? Or is every route other than N/A cheating when it comes to beating your kingly time of 16.8? If you look at my car I am going for a balance of speed and looks. If you really want me to scrap the whole looks side we will see who comes out with the better times. :rolleyes: Oh really? Do you know what has to be done? Have you ever stopped to think HOW to make it work than will it work? To me for the time in effort for the supercharger is a lot cheaper than spending almost 1500 more on a turbo that will give me the same results. If you didn't forget I have a ATX and it is not as simple as getting a new clutch and LSD. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,692
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,692 |
Hector you have an EMAIL....
Joe Hartley "yes I know it's a MTX Zetec but it beats having a ATX Duratec" Champagne 96 GL MTX some mods dynoed at 114.2whp and 124.4wtq (pre CTA intake) 16.858 @ 80.76mph (yes it's slow but still faster than D Davis) AIM: ZetecRacing My Site My Profile
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,969
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,969 |
I would think humidity is a good thing...
Isn't humid air more dense?
That's why colder air is better...
Kharma is very real and she is one mean b!tch.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,523
Moderator
|
|
Moderator
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 2,523 |
Well the "feel" of this thread sure changed 
125.2 FWHP - 126.5 FWTQ
SVT exhaust (#4 of 9) - B&M FPR - Custom CAI - bnoon optimized TB #1 & 2 (beat that!!)
Black '98.5 SE Zetec MTX
Best quote seen in a chat - "Jinx 12345678910 you owe me a naked picture of yourself!"
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,692
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,692 |
Originally posted by D Davis: Well the "feel" of this thread sure changed It did
Joe Hartley "yes I know it's a MTX Zetec but it beats having a ATX Duratec" Champagne 96 GL MTX some mods dynoed at 114.2whp and 124.4wtq (pre CTA intake) 16.858 @ 80.76mph (yes it's slow but still faster than D Davis) AIM: ZetecRacing My Site My Profile
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,692
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,692 |
Originally posted by redhawk:
I would think humidity is a good thing...
Isn't humid air more dense?
That's why colder air is better... but humid air isn't cold there for it doesn't help. also humid air has water in it cars don't really like water in the engine.
Joe Hartley "yes I know it's a MTX Zetec but it beats having a ATX Duratec" Champagne 96 GL MTX some mods dynoed at 114.2whp and 124.4wtq (pre CTA intake) 16.858 @ 80.76mph (yes it's slow but still faster than D Davis) AIM: ZetecRacing My Site My Profile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
