|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,969
Member
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,969 |
Originally posted by maTTZ:
redhawk, you are a cocksucker. if you must have proof that i own a twin turbo 300zx ask Zetec Eric, an administrator. He lives in my home town, and has seen my car numerous times. That is the whole reason I have any connection with the contour in general. When you come on here and start insulting people right off the bat you are going to catch some flak. Especially if its a buddy of mine. Just so I am clear, you are still a poser. If you weren't you would have posted some of the things I asked about instead of throwing around insults. Just post some stuff and I will gladly retract my statements. But that's what people with no proof or real validity to their arguments do on the internet. They start calling people names and throwing tantrums like 4 year old little girls. Thanks for playing  BTW: Eric is not an administrator on this site. His is on FC.org. AND- if you provide those things, I give you much props for owning a legendary car. Truly an impressive vehicle. Until then I will continue assuming you a pleeb who sits on his parents's computer and types erroneous crap just so you can feel better about yourself.
Kharma is very real and she is one mean b!tch.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 647
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 647 |
Originally posted by maTTZ:
redhawk, you are a cocksucker. if you must have proof that i own a twin turbo 300zx ask Zetec Eric, an administrator. He lives in my home town, and has seen my car numerous times. That is the whole reason I have any connection with the contour in general. Shut your mouth unless you have something to say that actually has meaning. Don't go prancing around replying to peoples' posts if you don't know wtf you are talking about. You sure do like to call names over the Internet dude (that?s SO weak), I guarantee that if you were face to face with me or Redhawk you would change your tune. Go back to your little rice hole man? 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14
Junior Member
|
|
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 14 |
I am not a poser.
I do own a 92 ttz, charcoal grey. go to twinturbo.net and search through my posts, you will see. ask me anything about my car that i could only know by owning it.
I would post pics, but I do not know how. I am not an internet junkie as you suspect.
You don't have to believe me if that's how you are. I would have nothing to gain by making up lies on the internet to people I don't know about cars I don't own.
Yes, I call people names when they make incredibly ignorant statements without the slightest explanation. Don't talk **** about my car, as you don't even know what years it was sold here (burg).
If I find out how to post pics I will, even though you guys will still say I don't own my car. You will just say I grabbed pics from somewhere else and called them my own.
Whatever floats your boat, but I am not lying about my car.
Oh, and whoever made the comment, (I think it was redhawk) about owning a piece of history, thank you, i appreciate it.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 339
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 339 |
burgman:what v-8 would you like me to specify?the GT was the first to pop into my mind,how about the corvette,F-150,cobra,t-bird,ram huh?my post wasn't meant to offend anyone just voiceing my opinions.I have to admit that is mad torque.My engine puts out 100 torque.i geuss 174= your stang.I am by no means saying my car is fast.
BTW: I am not a ricer,and I resent that remark greatly.The only reason I have this car is because my mom gave it to me, and with how much has been spent on this POS I could have a much nicer car, and it sure as he!! wouldn't be a honda.If I had a big a$$ tail pipe, ugly non- painted body kits and a wing taller than me, then I wouldn't mind you calling me a ricer.Oh and have you seen the women on the rice burners?
SQ+:alot of what people here are saying is there opinion, but they act like you are suposed to take it as fact.No offense, but I geuss it's time for the "talk" :rolleyes: when you get back to OK.
91' civic sedan.iceman CAI
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 339
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 339 |
mattz did make some really stupid remarks just as I did,but (if he actually owns that car)chances are that he can beat the **** out of most of the cars on this forum.I'm willing to bet that the TTZ he speaks of could devastate your stang.
BTW:burgman what is your definition of a ricer?
91' civic sedan.iceman CAI
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 647
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 647 |
Originally posted by maTTZ:
the z was sold in the u.s. from 90-96. since you are a hick, i'll do the math for you- 6 years. So what? your car was brought here for 6 years, not 4? my bad. The fact still remains that it was pulled out of the US market, because it could not compete (in the only place it counts SALES) with the domestics or the imports of the day. Originally posted by maTTZ:
second, look at the engineering on both cars and tell me which is designed better. just take a look at the statistics on both engines. What is so special about a TT 3.0? My car runs better stock numbers than yours and does it n/a. Since you won?t post a slip, I will resort to bench racing: car-stats.com has your car running a 15.4 (Motor Trend). I ran a 15.5 in my Contour w/ a 2.5 n/a? not impressed. The Romeo engine in my car has only been in production since 2001, so the design is obviously newer than yours. In addition, any manufacturer can slap a turbo on an engine and make a car quick; the trick is to do it n/a. Do you have any idea what a TT 4.6 Stang will run? I can?t find anything else that you posted, that warrants a response??? What else you got boy?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,657
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 2,657 |
So much for the Zetec discussion...could those of you arguing about Mustangs and 300Z's please take it somewhere else?
This thread has completely outlived its usefulness...
If only I was a moderator...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,178
Moderator
|
|
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,178 |
I agree. Lock this Bitch!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 647
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 647 |
Originally posted by codeo:
BTW: I am not a ricer,and I resent that remark greatly.The only reason I have this car is because my mom gave it to me, and with how much has been spent on this POS I could have a much nicer car, and it sure as he!! wouldn't be a honda.If I had a big a$$ tail pipe, ugly non- painted body kits and a wing taller than me, then I wouldn't mind you calling me a ricer.Oh and have you seen the women on the rice burners?
Codeo, If your not a ricer a apologize for calling you one. It?s very rare that I see a stock looking Civic SI in the ATL. You got to see it from a Mustang owner?s point of view. For every tastefully modded civic I see? I get ten ricers that want to race me, because my car is a target. The V8 is about low end Torque, you can?t compare specific outputs on HP. In order to get a high specific output you have to give up torque (n/a). For example? As I mentioned I raced an Acura CL Type-S: Mustang: 260hp / 302tq Acura: 260hp / 224tq I walked him bad! His specific output is higher than mine, but I beat him due to the torque advantage. I get the torque advantage because of more displacement. What exactly are you guys driving at with the specific output argument? What does it prove, if you lose the race because you're lacking torque 
|
|
|
|
|
