Why a 94? Don't the computers on those suck compared to the 89-93 computers?
I'm guessing that's why there's a conversion harness to put an 89-93 computer in a 94?
By the way, my 88 Mustang GT cost me $2350 with 116K miles
on it over a year ago. Needed a new T5 transmission and still
needs a paint job, but it was in good condition otherwise and
had never been modified. I spent about $150 on the mass-air
upgrade.
Not sure what the 94 has over the 88 other than being newer?
Brian