Originally posted by TBoomer:
What I'm getting at is, if this became a US Gov. policy, you would be onboard with it, correct?

If, due to this policy, your family was killed by a terrorist act, would you reconsider your support for this policy?

Please, correct me if I'm reading you wrong on this.



While I can't speak for ZZD (so I will post my own opinion), I would like to think that I would still support the policy. The loss of many loved ones in my life has lead me to be a little bit of a fatalist.


On a slight tangent. I have to ask for those that seem to have the attitude that "anything is worth it, to save one (American) life" Does that apply to other things? Or just terrorism? For I am a numbers kind of guy, and on the list of preventable deaths in the US, terrorism doesn't even score high enough to be statistically significant.

"Bros before Hoes" <-- More men need this mentality.