|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,220
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,220 |
Quote:
I get it just fine, I have from the start. We were both talking about profiling in one way shape or form. Your arrogance must block your powers of deduction. One word my friend, Hypocrite. You can twist it any way you want. Make whatever snide comments you like about my ability to read and understand your bombastic literary. We were probably closer in idea than than you thought, had you cared to look. I'm done.
Jim T.
"Closer in idea than [I] thought"?
I "cared to look" thanks. Here's your ideas:
Originally posted by jthursby: start strip searching 30ish middle-eastern looking men and women before flights. Restrict their movement anywhere they go.
Your very next post:
Originally posted by jthursby: I said muslim people, not just LOOKING muslim. ALL of them.
(your emphasis, not mine, and actually, as clearly evidenced above you did say "looking")
You were very explicit in your ideas on how to "profile" -- "strip-searching ALL 30-ish middle-eastern LOOKING men and women and ALL muslims" [we'll ignore the fact that almost none of the known terrorists are anywhere near the age of 30 or a woman so your 'profile' sucks; you would literally capture more terrorists by strip-searching all white guys than you would profiling 30-ish muslim men and women]. You were also very insistent that any new security measures not effect anyone outside this profile at all.
That is the only insight that you provided into your opinion on profiling and how it should work. If you think that's even remotely similar in idea to what I'm talking about you're still not getting it because it's damn near the total opposite.
2003 Mazda6s 3.0L MTX
Webpage
2004 Mazda3s 2.3L ATX
|
|
|
|
|
|