Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 443
C
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
C
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 443
Originally posted by warmonger:
How does your nissan 3.5 compare to that? About the same with an extra .5L displacement. All things considered the 3.0L conversion with cams exhaust and tuning is about as efficient as the 3.5L in the 350z producing less power but not by a lot and definitely expected with the half liter smaller engine.

So its all relative.




The VQ35DE rev-up engine with the new cams is dyno'ing over 250rwhp in the 06 350Z's bone stock. Add Nismo cams, intake, and exhaust (similar to the scenario you outlined for the 3.0L Duratec) and the numbers only go higher. And MANY people have tuned the VQ30DE engines well beyond any Duratec engine without having to replace stock internals.

As a former SVTC owner, I loved the Duratec engine, but I wouldn't put in the same class as Nissan's award winning V6 lineup for 10 years running. Just my .02. And in short order the next gen Nissan V6 will be out, and it'll trump the competition once again...

Last edited by cjbaldw; 07/28/06 02:01 AM.

Best Regards, HitchHiker 05 Altima SE-R - smoke, 6-spd - Fujita CAI Best stock times: 1/4: 14.366 @ 98.99MPH - 2.366 60 ft 1/8: 9.373 @ 79.84MPH - 2.366 60 ft
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,653
K
I have no life
Offline
I have no life
K
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 21,653
Originally posted by Y2KGreenSE:
Just because the CSVT [or SVTC to some purists] was canned, doesn't mean SVT is dead.



Dude. Where have you been? SVT IS DEAD.

Though Ford will still have some performance cars.

Last edited by Kremithefrog; 07/28/06 02:00 AM.

98.5 SVT 91 Escort GT (almost sold) 96 ATX Zetec (i brake to watch you swerve) FS: SVT rear sway bar WTB: Very cheap beater CEG Dragon Run - October 13-15
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
W
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
W
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Originally posted by Pete D:

AFAIK, Ford's market share is still slipping and this isn't going to bring many customers too them. Sure people might end up getting a Freestyle or something with the new engine (because it isn't underpowered any more) but they won't be stealing any competition from the Japanese (and now Korean) name plates, which is what they NEED to do.




And you think its high powered engines and turbos that are winning the Japanese a higher market share?
NOT. Those are low volume niche vehicles.
It is the trucks and commuter cars that the Japanese are winning at, mainly through higher quality, reliability, and resale value...or at least the perception of that.

They are still riding high on their reputation from the 80s and 90s though in reality they are now suffering from some of the same stinging recalls and quality issues that the big three have been going through for years.
Witness the latest string of recalls and Toyota executives that are under investigation right now.

I really think that Ford isn't producing vehicles that are behind the competition, they aren't. The vehicles are reliable and high quality. It is the American Mindset and impression of quality from the 70s and 80s that still persists and is driving a lot of present day attitudes....which directly affects sales.

Think about it, you buy a new Ford and you get one problem and you think "Hell, poor quality american car I shoulda bought a Japanese car, this is the first sign of a lemon"

You buy a Japanese car and get one problem and think " Oh well, they aren't perfect and this is a minor issue, probably the only problem I'll have on this HIGH QUALITY Japanese car, man I'm glad I didn't buy a Ford as it would be so much worse"

In effect the attitude will now cause the person to slam the american car on initial quality surveys yet with the japanese car they will minimize the problem to defend their purchase of the higher quality car.

So there is so much more going on in this issue of Technological superiority and quality versus the Perception of quality or advantage.


Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760 356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas! See My Mods '05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red '06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
W
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
W
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Originally posted by cjbaldw:
Originally posted by warmonger:
How does your nissan 3.5 compare to that? About the same with an extra .5L displacement. All things considered the 3.0L conversion with cams exhaust and tuning is about as efficient as the 3.5L in the 350z producing less power but not by a lot and definitely expected with the half liter smaller engine.

So its all relative.




The VQ35DE rev-up engine with the new cams is dyno'ing over 250rwhp in the 06 350Z's bone stock. Add Nismo cams, intake, and exhaust (similar to the scenario you outlined for the 3.0L Duratec) and the numbers only go higher. And MANY people have tuned the VQ30DE engines well beyond any Duratec engine without having to replace stock internals.

As a former SVTC owner, I loved the Duratec engine, but I wouldn't put in the same class as Nissan's award winning V6 lineup for 10 years running. Just my .02. And in short order the next gen Nissan V6 will be out, and it'll trump the competition once again...




You joker, I tuned my STOCK Block duratec with stock internals to well above any normal engine and at least to levels as high or higher than any stock nissan engine can handle. I won't say its better but it isn't inferior by any means. The SVT 2.5L engine was award winning in the years 10 best engines in those short three years it was made.
It was making 200HP out of a 2.5L when nissan was making 222HP out of a 3.0L.

You're talking about a 3.5L in their top of the line sports car dynoing what, only 15HP more than some of our home-built enthusiast engines?

Go smoke some more of that Nissan tailpipe. lol
If Ford would make available some higher performance cams through their motorsports division then things might be even more dramatically in the our favor.
Instead we have to rob parts from commuter cars to NEARLY equal the motor output of a Nissan sports car motor. Imagine if we had some race designed cams.....

And have you ever compared the dyno of a modifed 3L with the nissan 3.5L in the Altima/Maxima? The Duratec with SVT cams is so much broader and flatter.


Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760 356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas! See My Mods '05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red '06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,193
Z
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
Z
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,193
The only problem is the American product needs to improve it's look/touch/feel. The Fusion's interior looks and feels somewhat less substantial than the Mazda6, for example. The platform also suffers from a lack of differentiation between the Fusion and Milan. The Zephyr is a story for another time.


Brad "Diva": 2004 Mazda 6s 5-door, Volcanic Red Rex: 1988 Mazda RX-7 Vert, Harbor Blue.
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,220
S
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
S
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,220
Quote:

They said that it is designed for adding, direct injection, turbo-charging, hyrbridization and other technologies down the road. Yet, all of those techs are here today (and some, like turbos have been around a long time). IMO, if they wanted to make a big splash they should have put some of those things in the engine NOW.




Engines have to last 8-10 years at a minimum. You can't go and bring out everything you've got right out of the starting gate.

Ford isn't hurting at all for a high-powered engine. It's got more high-powered motors it can whip out if need be than anyone short of the General. It's hurting for a mid-ranged 230-260hp V6, which is precisely what the Duratec35 is designed to fill.

As time marches on, they'll bring out the more complicated stuff. Just like Nissan moved the VQ35 from 240hp to 300hp over time.

Aside from giving yourself room to grow, bringing out the big engineering only increases the odds of problems. You don't want to give your brand-new multi-billion dollar motor a bad reputation because you came out the gate with a twin-turbocharged, direct-injectection motor that had some teething issues. Look what the 13B-REW used in the 1993+ RX-7 did for the reputation of Rotary engines for a perfect example of what a bad version of a motor can do to an entire line of them.

Quote:

AFAIK, Ford's market share is still slipping and this isn't going to bring many customers too them. Sure people might end up getting a Freestyle or something with the new engine (because it isn't underpowered any more) but they won't be stealing any competition from the Japanese (and now Korean) name plates, which is what they NEED to do.




Ford's overall market share is decreasing yes. Because it's truck sales are down 14%. But the all-important car sales are up 7%.

Ford isn't losing ground to the Japanese because it's motors aren't big enough. There are countless reasons why, motors being the least of which. Small cars and small engines are what sells for the Japanese companies. And putting a 300hp motor in a Fusion might sell a couple thousand, but it's not going to sell a quarter-million. For the incredible vast majority of consumers of sedans and crossovers, a V6 only needs to be large enough to provide some confidence-inducing torque, but small enough to provide the fuel efficiency to go with it. Few consumers are wowed by some outrageous high-powered version of family cars or crossovers which is why to this day I have never seen an Altima SE-R on the road, nor do any of my local dealers have any in stock. The demand is virtually nil.

If Ford had a sports coupe that was competing against the 350z then you'd have a point if they were sticking a 265hp motor in it. But, unfortunately, they don't. But in the cars that they are putting the Duratec35 into, it will provide them with more than adequate power for the current market and, in the case of the Edge, what I believe will be class-leading power.

Is that going to "save" Ford? No. Probably not. But sticking a 320hp motor wouldn't help them any more either. All that'd get them is even more people going "Pfft. American companies just don't get it" while they go and buy their 32mpg 260hp Japanese cars.


2003 Mazda6s 3.0L MTX Webpage
2004 Mazda3s 2.3L ATX
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 3,143
P
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
P
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 3,143
Originally posted by sigma:



Ford isn't losing ground to the Japanese because it's motors aren't big enough. There are countless reasons why, motors being the least of which. Small cars and small engines are what sells for the Japanese companies. And putting a 300hp motor in a Fusion might sell a couple thousand, but it's not going to sell a quarter-million. For the incredible vast majority of consumers of sedans and crossovers, a V6 only needs to be large enough to provide some confidence-inducing torque, but small enough to provide the fuel efficiency to go with it. Few consumers are wowed by some outrageous high-powered version of family cars or crossovers which is why to this day I have never seen an Altima SE-R on the road, nor do any of my local dealers have any in stock. The demand is virtually nil.

If Ford had a sports coupe that was competing against the 350z then you'd have a point if they were sticking a 265hp motor in it. But, unfortunately, they don't. But in the cars that they are putting the Duratec35 into, it will provide them with more than adequate power for the current market and, in the case of the Edge, what I believe will be class-leading power.

Is that going to "save" Ford? No. Probably not. But sticking a 320hp motor wouldn't help them any more either. All that'd get them is even more people going "Pfft. American companies just don't get it" while they go and buy their 32mpg 260hp Japanese cars.




I agree with a lot of this. Ford needs to get their market share back if they wish to succeed in the long run. While making a high HP engine do it, especially in gas-tight times? Doubtful.

My response was more in line with all the people on here (as well as over at E-C) that are ready to bust out a ticket tape parade for this motor, when the fact is it won't make a huge difference. The only possible long term implication I see is lower cost because it is their first engine that is DFSS (Designed for Six Sigma).


"Bros before Hoes" <-- More men need this mentality.
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,143
A
Addicted CEG\'er
Offline
Addicted CEG\'er
A
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,143
Originally posted by ZoomZoom Diva:
It's far from perfection. It needs forced induction to keep up with naturally aspirated competitors, and even in that guise cannot compete in economy and refinement. GM has a horrible penchant in the last 20 years or so for pushing antiquated technologies as far as they can go instead of pushing themselves ahead with new ones.




I agree, they also need to get their act together with their transmissions... My brother works for auto owners insurance, they gave him an 06' Grand prix Base model as a company car, thats all they have are the 04-07 grand prix's Every single one of their fleet cars have had to have their transmissions replaced at about 30K miles. Im not exaturating... EVERY ONE

That scares the hell out of me.... mom has an 05' with 24K miles... And its been shifting hard from park into reverse if you park on an incline.


98 Corolla LE 1.8L DOHC 1ZZFE TEIN H.Tech Springs Tokico HP series Struts Short ram air intake Tsudo Axel Back Exhaust ... if a jelly fish stung me.. would you pee on the wound?
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 9,872
G
Addicted CEG\'er
Offline
Addicted CEG\'er
G
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 9,872
Originally posted by TGO:
Originally posted by ????¯?¬?¬?º:
Originally posted by Beans:
man, you people are so mean

i couldnt imagine a bigger engine than a 3.0 in a contour, hell the 2.5 is big..

Someone here will do it tho...




way under powered..the Nissan VQ 3.5 is 270hp - 300hp..




yeah and they're also in cars that are alot more expensive too.




not at all..u can find that in an Altima, Maxima, G35 sedan/coupe..FX..alota other models..or u can get a pre-owned and still enjoy the VQ..


#0009
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 286
K
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
K
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 286
Originally posted by cjbaldw:
Originally posted by warmonger:
How does your nissan 3.5 compare to that? About the same with an extra .5L displacement. All things considered the 3.0L conversion with cams exhaust and tuning is about as efficient as the 3.5L in the 350z producing less power but not by a lot and definitely expected with the half liter smaller engine.

So its all relative.




The VQ35DE rev-up engine with the new cams is dyno'ing over 250rwhp in the 06 350Z's bone stock. Add Nismo cams, intake, and exhaust (similar to the scenario you outlined for the 3.0L Duratec) and the numbers only go higher. And MANY people have tuned the VQ30DE engines well beyond any Duratec engine without having to replace stock internals.

As a former SVTC owner, I loved the Duratec engine, but I wouldn't put in the same class as Nissan's award winning V6 lineup for 10 years running. Just my .02. And in short order the next gen Nissan V6 will be out, and it'll trump the competition once again...




I wouldn't say ANY Duratec, don't forget Aston Martin 6.0l v12's are duratec's. But now I'm just being picky....sorry.


Kip 98 CSVT Black/Midnight Blue
Page 4 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5