|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,220
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,220 |
Originally posted by Doppelg�¤nger: Originally posted by Rouar: Originally posted by Doppelg�¤nger: I like them, but no manual trans in the V6's. I hope they make a sport SVT version. Even if they do, it'll sell for well over 30k. Not like when the CSVTs came out. Lotsa car for under 25k.
Yes .. ten years ago. Welcome to inflation.
Even with inflation, there are still deals to be had in the car world. Technology is cheaper now too. So it's an offset. Take the Mazda6 for instance. Easily under 25k and it gives with the CSVT did.
The Fusion and Mazda6 are virtually identical cars (performance-wise since they're basically the same underneath) that are virtually identically-priced. If an SVT Fusion was 'well over' $30K it would offer considerably more performance than a "under $25K" Mazda6, and therefore (using your logic that Mazda6==CSVT) considerably more than the CSVT.
2003 Mazda6s 3.0L MTX
Webpage
2004 Mazda3s 2.3L ATX
|
|
|
|
|
|