Originally posted by RTStabler51: Originally posted by Tourige: Originally posted by RTStabler51: Originally posted by Tourige: IIRC Direct Port - Each port gets its own nozzle.
Im not trying to "Correct" Warmonger as i know he knows more about these cars than i ever will. Im just Going on what i know as direct port, Ive never heard of someone using 2 nozzles for Direct port, every one i have seen has a nozzle for each port.
Sorry, i didnt mean to rock the boat, just throwing ideas out there for the thread starter.
Tom wasn't referring to a direct port setup, he was just stating that you may want to use two seperate nozzles for the fuel and nitrous. Personally, I used a Shark Nozzle, I believe made by NZ. Worked fine for me and I would stick with that for simplicity sake.
Thats not what he was saying, he is saying you drill 2 35 shot nozzles into the UIM Corners. I think you mis read his post(running a different nitrous and fuel line to different corners= )
saw that but forgot about it. I understand his reasoning for it, but don't think its really needed for anything under ~100hp shot. Some people worry about the nitrous/fuel mixture hitting that 'wall' and it fall out of the air and puddling in the intake. I think his idea is a decent one, but doubt anyone will every try it.
You're probably right. I only put forth the idea because I think the savings in thermal expansion might be fairly significant. I'm thinking a split 50shot that goes into the manifold with good mixing is probably worth a 75shot upstream in net power, or close to it. If I'm right, that means means you could get what...maybe 30% more time on each bottle fill to go just as fast? It'd pay for itself in a month, probably a week for me! 
Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760
356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas!
See My Mods
'05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red
'06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
|