No, pointing out to you that because it's your opinion does not mean it is true, is not a symantics argument.
There has been far too much sensationalization of our troops doing wrong over-seas, only to have the investigation prove that they did nothing wrong. All the big media outlets, CNN especially, do nothing but report on Iraq with only negatives. Hell, even their reporting of Zarquawi's death had headlines like "He's Dead, but is it really good for us?" They are so biased in their hatred of Bush that they take it out wherever they can, including our troops.
I forget his name, but there was a soldier not too long ago whose name was drug through the mud, called murderer, only to be cleared of all wrong doing. There is no need for these sensationalized stories in a time of war. Do you not think our enemy reads our news reports??? Do you not think that if the soldiers are proven innocent, that these reports do nothing but bolster support for Al Queda?
My question is why can the major news outlets not report anything good about the war? And why can they not save reporting these details of events, after they are confirmed by a court of law?
