Originally posted by Ray:
The comparison wasn't about safety... you're missing a little something, there.


the comparison was that "someone" has done it with no ill effects so it MUST be okay to do it!

which is not true. If you're gonna try to knock my comparison down, do it by countering with some information as to why you were correct, rather than throw the intent off by trying to guide the response away from factual data, and instead on to semantics.




Never said it would be ok to do in the context of the right thing to do. Just implying an option and stating it would not throw a code. Don't care if it is ok. Not going to counter because I think I'm correct. Just giving an alternative which is what this site used to be about.

E0 SVT Kids, yeah, I have kids. How many do you want?