Originally posted by GTO Pete:
from what I can see, a poorly conducted test.
From what you can see how is what "ccwad" did considered a poorly conducted test? He applied two products on his DD truck, took pictures and reported on his feelings of the two products. Isn't that the exact same thing that you do when your comparing products? Is it simply because he is not "Waxguru" or "CorvetteWorld"? Or is it a "poorly conducted test" because you wish the results would have came out differently?  I am not saying that what ccwad did is the "end all, be all" test of two products, but I don't appreciate how you keep slamming products that I use and say that they are garbage when you have never even used them.
I am not saying that Reflections owns all when it comes to durability, but it is definitely no slouch. It seems that when judging a product you place an extremely heavy emphasis stricly on durability. And while I agree that durability is very important, there are other factors to consider such as ease of use, appearance, and value. I have found that for my needs, Reflections appearance wise is killer! Is EXTREMELY easy to use and is durable enough to suit me just fine for how much time and effort I want to put into detailing my car.
I have been finding myself trying out more and more online products during the past year, and I find that they are great! But there is also a need for a quality OTC product that appearance wise looks great!, is easy to use, is affordable, and that someone can easily get at their local auto parts store.
"Sound Quality Loud" SVT
1998.5 Silver CSVT
| 
