Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,220 |
Originally posted by todras: He was implying the AWD system in the MS6 is worthless.
This I know, I meant to clarify "AWD" as "Mazda's AWD". Of course the MS3 would get the same system found in the MS6 if it ever were to get it.
If variable FWD-biased AWD is "worthless" and a 60:40 weight distribution is "nose-heavy", then the Mitsubishi EVO must be a total piece of [censored] since its' AWD system functions essentially the same way and it's actually more "nose-heavy" (by a very small amount) than the MS6 is.
2003 Mazda6s 3.0L MTX
Webpage
2004 Mazda3s 2.3L ATX
|