Originally posted by spgoode:
Originally posted by BP:
for all their precision and surprise it's highly unlikely that there wasn't some sort of 'inside' help.



What specifically are you speaking of that would require inside help to pull-off? I know it's sometimes hard to distinguish television from reality but give me a break.



please don't turn this discussion pissy. as i mentioned earlier, no one here knows the whole story. what we do know is that our intel had been tracking the suspected 9/11 terrorists for a while, but for some reason didn't connect the dots. there were various explanations, but we don't know all the details or what happened behind the scenes. please don't act like you know the details because you don't. 'inside help' could have come in many forms. is it completely out of the realm of belief that intel agents could have knowingly or unknowingly passed information that was used against us? ever heard of earl pitts or james smith?


Originally posted by spgoode:
Conspiracy-mongering is counter-productive. It's going to take a lot more than the nonsense in this video to make me think there was any more to 9/11 than was revealed.



that's because you're a person that doesn't care to know more than what you've been told. do you honestly believe the gov has told us the whole story regarding 9/11, the war in iraq, al qaeda, etc? any person in their right mind knows there's more to it than what we've seen on tv or read in the papers. does that mean its a conspiracy? no. all i'm saying is that there's always more to the story than we're told. sometimes it's for a good reason, other times its because someone is covering their ass. personally i'd rather pick through the mess and make up my own mind rather than being told/fed what i should believe. that's all i'm saying.

'03 Saab 9-5 Aero