Originally posted by RogerB:
Originally posted by MxRacer:
Originally posted by bobbyd:
Originally posted by Arhethia:
well i can see, after releasing the Z06 vett. Same perfrmance and handling. but for 70k.

I was pissed about the vett comparison to Ford GT. Even though u can never replace a GT with a vette. NEVER. But damn GM did a great job!!

maybe im biased but id replace the ford GT with an 06 Z06 anyday , hahassorry dude lol


The new Z06 is my dream car, and yes i am a chevy fan , u cant go better getting the power, performance of a supercar for 1/3 of the price



comparing a GT to a ZO6 is like comparing a picasso to a velvet elvis painting. they both get the same job done, but one is exceptionally cooler than the other.



I had hoped at one point that the GT would be able to compete with the 'Vette, but when it actually came out, the price tag put it in line with "base" model Ferarris, which is sort of the point of the GT40 history. Still, the Vette remains in a class of its own, and given the performance of the Z06, if it's really comparable to the new Ford GT, economics would have to rule.



If you're the type where "economics would have to rule" then you're not really the type of person the GT is aimed at.

While an EVO can beat a Lambo performance-wise, that doesn't make it a supercar.

2003 Mazda6s 3.0L MTX Webpage 2004 Mazda3s 2.3L ATX