|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by Ray: You are right, Marky.. there are... those that have the base performance to SUPPORT not having any.. in, and of itself, removing the secondaries is NOT a performance mod.
It is a driveability mod for those who already have the performance.
You have that completely backwards.
The IMRC is a drivability device. It allows for the tiny 2.5L engine (i.e. no low end torque!) to mate up to a slushbox (no control over rpm) and not "feel" like the 2.5L engine it is.
The IMRC is removed for purely performance reasons. No IMRC flutter! 'nuff said. No IMRC opening & closing all the time (and it does due to the programming ) causing horrible airflow quality. No IMRC cycling under moderate throttle. No rods & plates causing turbulence right before the head inlets. The list goes on & on.
Removing the IMRC causes noticeable drivability issues. It requires custom tuning to alleviate this.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|