Originally posted by chrisilversvt:
Originally posted by Davo:
Originally posted by chrisilversvt:
maybe you should spend a little less time worrying about whats on other mens bodies and worry about yourself...thank you now have a nice day...




He could give less than a [censored] about what you have on your arm. What he's pointing out (successfully, judging by your response) is that you've said contradictory things in this thread.



well it seems to me he's concerned because he keeps talking about it....



So, Mr. Reading Comprehension, where did I ever mention your tattoo? Fact is, I never once mentioned your tattoo itself. I could give a flying [censored] what you have on your arm.

I was pointing out to you why people kept going on about your 'tribal' tattoo because you were apparently baffled by the fact that people continued to call it one even though you had apparently stated "several times in this thread" that it was not 'tribal' and it was in fact 'custom-designed'. How those two are mutually exclusive I've yet to determine, but I don't care because I never mentioned you tattoo. I posted about your contradiction not your tattoo.

Quote:

anything i may have originally said that was contradictory in this thread was clearly explained elsewhere in this thread....which is all i was trying to point out to sigma...but then he kept on and on without reading everything i posted.....



I read everything that you posted. More than apparently you can say since you can't even remember what you wrote your own self. What you posted after the fact doesn't make it less contradictory, in fact it's what you posted after the fact that makes it contradictory. Your first lesson in reading comprehension needs to be that there is a difference between reading comprehension and meaning comprehension. I got what you meant, I've been reading enough drivel from illiterates on the Internet long enough to decipher meaning where all grammar and form of thought is missing. But what you meant and what you said are two different things. I was pointing out your contradictory statements since you apparently didn't realize you made them and didn't understand why people kept calling your tattoo 'tribal'.

Simple fact is, prior to you making the post claiming you had "stated several times" that it was not "tribal" you had only posted on this thread twice. And in both of those posts you explicitly stated that your tattoo was "tribal". In your second post you managed to say "it is tribal", "it's not really tribal", and "it would be classified as tribal" all in the exact same post! (I would say "in the exact same sentence" but you don't really write in any sort of legible sentences)

The only thing you stated "several times" was that your tattoo was 'tribal', only once prior to your claim did you say that it wasn't 'tribal', and even that statement was immediately followed by a 'but it would be classified as such'.

Congratulations, you graduate from the Bill Clinton School of Double Talk!

2003 Mazda6s 3.0L MTX Webpage 2004 Mazda3s 2.3L ATX