Contour Enthusiasts Group Archives Forums General Common Interests What was the point of the presidents speech today?

Originally posted by Andy W.:

---

Back to my point, it's not as easy as you think to produce good fakes,
-Andy

---

perhaps not in MD but here in LA you can get kick-ass fake driver's licenses that would fool a cop. not to mention fake money like i received recently fake birth certificates, social security cards and work papers are much easier to forge. not to mention you can always buy stolen authentic papers/ss cards and have a DL made to match. there are many employers, such as restaurants/fast food, who barely even glance at the papers and accept them as legit. kinda like when you go to a store and punk teenage clerk behind the counter asks to see your id when paying by credit card and pretends to actually look at it.

with anything, im sure there are sh*tty papers that are available but there are sure as hell plenty of good copies available too. producing phony paperwork is big business! although, with the exception of NY, LA is probably the bootleg capital of the US

Originally posted by Antonio Wright:

---

I would really like to know. First he calls the Minute Men vigilantes and then he continues to skirt around the issue. I guess when you have big business pulling your strings, you can only go so far.

---

Originally posted by iceddodo:

---

I think he just needed the public speaking practice. Its been five years and he still looks like a 12 year old getting "antidisestablishmentarianism" in a spelling bee.

---

Originally posted by Davo:

---

Originally posted by iceddodo:

---

I think he just needed the public speaking practice. Its been five years and he still looks like a 12 year old getting "antidisestablishmentarianism" in a spelling bee.

---

*sigh*

I'll take this opportunity to remind everyone that it is your side that lost to this idiot twice in an election, so what does it say about your side? Yes, that you are a bunch of even bigger idiots.

---

Why would we be idiots...we didn't vote for him! Twice!


Corbett: You forgot to raise your hand( or maybe your question has been answered just not with a direct response to you.)

Originally posted by PDXSVT:

---

When 25% of the people who voted for Bush later conclude they were big idiots for buying his campaigns (and it's only a matter of time for that), let us revisit this topic and see where you then place on the scale, as one of his more extreme proponents. I suspect there are some on this board who voted for Bush who would privately regret your inclination to indulge in "us" vs "them" where you unilaterally decide who is on which team and who are the idiots. It's fortunate for your community you express no aspirations to serve on the bench or as an elected official. But yeah, I'd donate to your campaign, that would be helping other, better candidates advance.

When I'm an idiot because Davo says so, that actually means the jury is still out.

---

Swing...and a miss!!!! You make a good attempt to equate approval rating with voting practices, but it doesn't work like that. Everything else you said made no sense (as it usually doesn't), and your "I'd donate to your campaign if you ran for office" line is getting rather tired.

Originally posted by Davo:

---

I'll take this opportunity to remind everyone that it is your side that lost to this idiot twice in an election, so what does it say about your side? Yes, that you are a bunch of even bigger idiots.

---

Originally posted by Davo:

---

Originally posted by iceddodo:

---

I think he just needed the public speaking practice. Its been five years and he still looks like a 12 year old getting "antidisestablishmentarianism" in a spelling bee.

---

*sigh*

I'll take this opportunity to remind everyone that it is your side that lost to this idiot twice in an election, so what does it say about your side? Yes, that you are a bunch of even bigger idiots.

---

john kerry lost so everyone who is not a Republican is an idiot?? that doesnt help much to your credibility Davo. sometimes you sound intelligent and sometimes you sound like youre still in high school.

GB won because he was THE Republican candidate. it also doesnt hurt that his father was a former president, a respected one at that. he was practically a shoe-in. the Dems didnt exactly have the best candidate themselves. Clinton probably could have beat him though. wonder why he didnt run back then.. was he still in college?

i love the fact that GB is our president. i get a chuckle out of his Bushisms and dorky antics and I voted for him. mostly because i wanted some conservative judges for the SCt. i am not pleased with his actions on the war however. i think he opened up a nice big fat can of worms and its still going to be a big mess well after he's gone.