|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,677
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,677 |
Originally posted by Davo: Damn, I guess he isn't banned.
Why would I be?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198 |
You started a thread that was purely flamebait. If the flamebait = ban rule was applied consistently, you would have been banned.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,677
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,677 |
Originally posted by Davo: You started a thread that was purely flamebait. If the flamebait = ban rule was applied consistently, you would have been banned.
In your eyes it was flamebait. I was asking a honest question, one in which I never got an answer.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198 |
Because the thread was locked, because it was flamebait.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,677
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,677 |
So any threads with a political agenda in them are automatically flamebait? I don't see that in the rules anywhere. Whoever closed that thread shut it because of the whining nature of the republican repliers, not because of my original post.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,718
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,718 |
Originally posted by â??â????â???â????â???â???: So any threads with a political agenda in them are automatically flamebait? I don't see that in the rules anywhere. Whoever closed that thread shut it because of the whining nature of the republican repliers, not because of my original post.
Put something of substance forth and I'll be more than happy to validate it or beat it down into the ground.
The key word in that sentence is "substance" if it was missed during it's first reading...
JaTo
e-Tough Guy
Missouri City, TX
99 Contour SVT
#143/2760
00 Corvette Coupe
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198 |
Flamebait is up to interpretation, so no, not every thread with a political agenda is considered flamebait. However, posting a topic that has been discussed here for the last 2 years, especially after not getting the flaming you were hoping for in the other thread, is considered flamebait.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,677
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,677 |
Originally posted by JaTo: Originally posted by â??â????â???â????â???â???: So any threads with a political agenda in them are automatically flamebait? I don't see that in the rules anywhere. Whoever closed that thread shut it because of the whining nature of the republican repliers, not because of my original post.
Put something of substance forth and I'll be more than happy to validate it or beat it down into the ground.
The key word in that sentence is "substance" if it was missed during it's first reading...
Bush has no substance. Therefore, I cannot comply with your request.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,899
Hard-core CEG'er
|
OP
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,899 |
Originally posted by â??â????â???â????â???â???: Originally posted by JaTo: Originally posted by â??â????â???â????â???â???: So any threads with a political agenda in them are automatically flamebait? I don't see that in the rules anywhere. Whoever closed that thread shut it because of the whining nature of the republican repliers, not because of my original post.
Put something of substance forth and I'll be more than happy to validate it or beat it down into the ground.
The key word in that sentence is "substance" if it was missed during it's first reading...
Bush has no substance. Therefore, I cannot comply with your request.
Good god SHUT THE [censored] UP!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,718
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,718 |
Originally posted by â??â????â???â????â???â???: Originally posted by JaTo: Originally posted by â??â????â???â????â???â???: So any threads with a political agenda in them are automatically flamebait? I don't see that in the rules anywhere. Whoever closed that thread shut it because of the whining nature of the republican repliers, not because of my original post.
Put something of substance forth and I'll be more than happy to validate it or beat it down into the ground.
The key word in that sentence is "substance" if it was missed during it's first reading...
Bush has no substance. Therefore, I cannot comply with your request.
Try. I'm no fan of Clinton and I can think of a few things he did right during his 8-year stint in office...
...or has my request thrown your intellectual capacity for cognative thought for a complete tail-spin?
It appears you are more about blindly jerking your political monkey off than having any level of debate over what hacks you off.
JaTo
e-Tough Guy
Missouri City, TX
99 Contour SVT
#143/2760
00 Corvette Coupe
|
|
|
|
|
|