Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 51
U
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
U
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 51
Originally posted by MadMerc97:
The Cobra is a pretty powerful car, but I'd rather have a GTO. Or a modified Trans Am. Or an older Corvette. But it seriously isn't that bad of a car. I'd take one in a heartbeat, but I wouldn't pay for it. Many more cost-efficient engines on the market for the money. Shoot for the kinda money you'd be spending, I'd go get an old Fox-body coupe, buy a 351C, strengthen the internals, give it more fuel, etc., get a good 6-spd transmission to go with it, and HEAVILY upgrade the suspension. For about the same money(if you're willing to put in the effort) you could have a MUCH faster Mustang. And you could say to people that THAT Mustang is YOURS, not some Hi-po factory tuner that thousands of others in the world have. Of course it would not be anywhere near the Cobra in refinement, but meh. I guess that's a bit much for a beginner tho...


are you kidding? 03-04 cobras are so easy and cheep to mod its no even funny. i have 496hp-525tq to the wheels with bolt ons and a very safe tune, for the bang for thr buck in mods NOTHING beats the cobra,i have personaly seen a 03 dyno 408rwhp with a cai and a catback, show me a gto or a trans am that can do that...


2003 Cobra - not stock... 496/525 rwhp/rwtq Kenne Bell here and waiting to go on... 2000 SVT Contour - Very stock...not for long
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,687
H
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
H
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,687
First of all, GTOs come factory with 400. Second of all, that can be fixed very easily with the same mods as the cobra. Third, Fox-bodies are lighter. Fourth, Trans Ams are easily modified to 400+horsepower for the budget in mind. I don't know what crack you must be smokin' to think that a 20K Cobra+mod money is cheaper and faster than an 8K WS6 with 12K in mods. WTF? Plus I won't respect the Mustang again until they make some NA power. I know it is nothing more than a different way of accomplishing tuning, but I for one prefer ALL-ENGINE power to just slapping on a blower.

Nice Cobra by the way.

Last edited by MadMerc97; 11/11/05 10:41 PM.

J.T. 2002 Chevrolet Silverado 294ci V8. Custom CAI, headers on the way... 1997 Mercury Mystique Zetec ATX Deceased February 2006
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 51
U
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
U
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 51
i have total respect for na power but to each is there own... there is nothing wrong with blowers, turbos or nos, i find the only people who complain about that stuff has never had it...but just think if i put 12k into my svt contour motor it would be fast too....for 300 bucks in mods on a cobra you could have 450 horse TO THE WHEELS, no gto will do that for 300 in mods, thats all im saying, oh and thanks for the compilment


2003 Cobra - not stock... 496/525 rwhp/rwtq Kenne Bell here and waiting to go on... 2000 SVT Contour - Very stock...not for long
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,857
C
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
C
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,857
Originally posted by MadMerc97:
The Cobra is a pretty powerful car, but I'd rather have a GTO. Or a modified Trans Am. Or an older Corvette. But it seriously isn't that bad of a car. I'd take one in a heartbeat, but I wouldn't pay for it. Many more cost-efficient engines on the market for the money. Shoot for the kinda money you'd be spending, I'd go get an old Fox-body coupe, buy a 351C, strengthen the internals, give it more fuel, etc., get a good 6-spd transmission to go with it, and HEAVILY upgrade the suspension. For about the same money(if you're willing to put in the effort) you could have a MUCH faster Mustang. And you could say to people that THAT Mustang is YOURS, not some Hi-po factory tuner that thousands of others in the world have. Of course it would not be anywhere near the Cobra in refinement, but meh. I guess that's a bit much for a beginner tho...





first of all you are spouting off at the mouth and have no clue what you are talking about........first off a 351c would be the worst choice for a late model mustang.....you would have to have motor mounts fabricated,custom headers,and tons of other misc. parts.....there are tons of better windsor based options out there that would kill the 351c,such as a 347 stroker,which is a direct fit...also it has way better head options as well....a nicely set up 347 with afr heads would destroy a 351c,which has very limited aftermarket for heads etc....a stroker could be built for half the cost of a 351c and make alot more power...and it will bolt right in,and there are tons of more parts available for a windsor based build...hell you could probably build a turbo windsor based stroker for about the same as you could a regular 351c and all the crap necessary to make it fit...


new,new ride! '99 svt black/mnb '95 mustang gt sold! '98 svt #800 sold!
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,857
C
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
C
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,857
Originally posted by MadMerc97:
First of all, GTOs come factory with 400. Second of all, that can be fixed very easily with the same mods as the cobra. Third, Fox-bodies are lighter. Fourth, Trans Ams are easily modified to 400+horsepower for the budget in mind. I don't know what crack you must be smokin' to think that a 20K Cobra+mod money is cheaper and faster than an 8K WS6 with 12K in mods. WTF? Plus I won't respect the Mustang again until they make some NA power. I know it is nothing more than a different way of accomplishing tuning, but I for one prefer ALL-ENGINE power to just slapping on a blower.

Nice Cobra by the way.





do you own either car????????have you even driven either car????????if not then stfu with your nonsense....like he said before a cobra with intake and exhaust will easily make 400 or more hp TO THE WHEELS....the '05 gto('04 only has 350 hp btw)makes 400 hp AT THE CRANK......with nothing more than a pulley upgrade the cobra will make well over 400 AT THE WHEELS.....since you want to compare apples to oranges(like your $8k ta with $12k in mods)take your beloved gto which costs more than an '03 cobra and put the difference in the cobra and it will destroy the gto...actually though stock for stock the cobra is equally as fast and costs less....

the guy with the '03 cobra was reffering to modding the cars with the same amount of money(not comparing purchase price which is ridiculous)take a ls1 camaro and an '03 cobra,and give each owner $500 to spend on mods....the cobra will destroy the ls1 every time.....hell the ls1 would probably only be just as fast or maybe even slower with $500 in mods and the cobra left stock....

if you want to really compare by purchase price,i'll buy a $3k mustang,and use the $5k difference in mods and kill the ta,so your point is meaningless.......

and you whine about the cobra being supercharged....big deal......so your saying something like an evo,or sti for example aren't any good either because they rely on a turbo for power


new,new ride! '99 svt black/mnb '95 mustang gt sold! '98 svt #800 sold!
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 51
U
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
U
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 51
thank you.


2003 Cobra - not stock... 496/525 rwhp/rwtq Kenne Bell here and waiting to go on... 2000 SVT Contour - Very stock...not for long
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,687
H
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
H
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,687
I have a better idea...

Let's take an '01 Cobra and an '01 WS6. Stock, the cobra loses. Conversation over. It isn't fair to compare the '03 Cobra to an earlier year F-Body. This conversation is nothing more than a conflict of opinions. Besides, a Fox-body mustang hasn't been considered 'late-model' for a decade. A 351C isn't difficult to fab-up mounts for. You just have to take the measurements right, and cut the metal right. Look a powerful NA engine is a good thing. I'm not saying FI engines are BAD, just another, viable method of tuning that I prefer to stay away from. That's it. I don't want to argue with you guys, just state a couple viable alternatives to the "'03 Cobra is god" lines you mustang fanboys spout off like scripture. Meh. Have it your way...


J.T. 2002 Chevrolet Silverado 294ci V8. Custom CAI, headers on the way... 1997 Mercury Mystique Zetec ATX Deceased February 2006
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 51
U
CEG\'er
Offline
CEG\'er
U
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 51
03-04 cobras are a scaled down version of god...j/k you shoud drive/ ride in one then you would be happy, besides i think its a great thing that major companys are building cars like cobras and gtos because they can ony get better from here...


2003 Cobra - not stock... 496/525 rwhp/rwtq Kenne Bell here and waiting to go on... 2000 SVT Contour - Very stock...not for long
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,857
C
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
C
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,857
Originally posted by MadMerc97:
I have a better idea...

Let's take an '01 Cobra and an '01 WS6. Stock, the cobra loses. Conversation over. It isn't fair to compare the '03 Cobra to an earlier year F-Body. This conversation is nothing more than a conflict of opinions. Besides, a Fox-body mustang hasn't been considered 'late-model' for a decade. A 351C isn't difficult to fab-up mounts for. You just have to take the measurements right, and cut the metal right. Look a powerful NA engine is a good thing. I'm not saying FI engines are BAD, just another, viable method of tuning that I prefer to stay away from. That's it. I don't want to argue with you guys, just state a couple viable alternatives to the "'03 Cobra is god" lines you mustang fanboys spout off like scripture. Meh. Have it your way...





wow your posts just keep getting more and more ridiculous...well then since to you its not fair to compare an '03 to an '01,then let's compare an '04 cobra to an '04 f-body,oh oops i forgot they don't make them anymore then how about an '04 cobra to an '04 gto,then the gto loses.conversation over......

and now since when is a fox body not considered a late model? maybe it is an earlier late model,but they have always been,and still are reffered to as late models...at the car show i was in last month the winner of best late model,was a mineral grey fox body.... oh but i forgot according to you fox bodies haven't been reffered to as late models for a decade...

i also never said it was all that difficult to fab up mounts for a 351c,i said that it would probably be the worst choice as far as cost and extra work...why bother fabbing up mounts,custom headers,and tons more little details to put in an engine that has far less aftermarket parts than a comparable windsor...and a windsor based build would fit right in and have more options to build a cost effective high hp n/a motor...

sure building a n/a motor with high hp #'s is great,but there is only so much you can get out of a n/a motor,and some form of f/i will be necessary...that's why most of the fastest cars in the world are using some form of f/i....also with f/i you get driveability....build you up a high compression n/a motor and tell me how streetable it is,and how good of mileage you get....now take a comparable f/i setup it will be driveable,and still probably pull down 20+ mpg....so again tell me why f/i is so bad...

i also never said the '03 cobra was god...just that its fast stock,and can be easily,and cheaply modded with simple bolt ons to make well over 400 hp to the wheels...by the way ugotbit i would love to see some more pics. of your cobra,i saw your engine pics. in the other thread...my cousin has an '04 that i've had the pleasure of driving a couple of times,and let's just say i didn't want to let go of the wheel...lol...


new,new ride! '99 svt black/mnb '95 mustang gt sold! '98 svt #800 sold!
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,687
H
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
H
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,687
well lessee. The Fox-body's design spans from 1979-1993(?) I would not call a car that's design came from the late seventies a 'late model'. And the 'F-body doesn't exist' thing is pretty lame. If you wanna be lame, let me bring up the Mustang II.

And are you trying to tell me that a Windsor is a better engine than a Cleveland? Please tell me you aren't. The Cleveland is WORLDS better than the weakling Windsor motor. And as for motor mounts and fabbing up stuff, the 351C/W/M are very similar to the small block 302. The 351 can and has been transplanted into several Mustang IIs and Fox-bodies before, so it isn't a bad idea.

Now as for your 'FI engines are some of the most powerful in the world' thing and then 'FI engines usually have better driveability'. Those two sentences don't match up. Those powerful FI cars tend to be very POOR in the handling area. AKA funny cars. Just try to drift one of those...I don't mean to be drastic, but meh. The handling and driveability is really dependent on the vehicle. Now, your MPG issue is valid. It takes a lot of fuel to make NA power, but it is becoming a little easier due to modern performance fuel-injection.

And as for the '03 Cobra. It's a fast car. I admit that. I just think other alternatives could yield a more interesting, and potentially more powerful vehicle than a factory tuner car put out by Ford. Just my opinion.

I like a good conversation. This is fun.


J.T. 2002 Chevrolet Silverado 294ci V8. Custom CAI, headers on the way... 1997 Mercury Mystique Zetec ATX Deceased February 2006
Page 3 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Moderated by  GTO Pete, Trapps_dup1 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5