I want to give some credit to cjbaldw for providing some arguments for same-sex marriage amendments that are intelligent and insiteful, at least for me. He has obviously done more research than most. This doesn't make me agree with some of his viewpoints, but the other side needs more people like him. Woodencross is a strict ultra-conservative christian, and I can respect that, but the information he uses to back himself up is only credible among others who are like him. Davo obviously likes to stir things up, and is always a welcome contributor, because he gets people involved. I dont like his methods sometimes like calling people out for not addressing his points, and then doing the same to others, but it's entertaining nonetheless. ZZD is surprisingly rational about the issue considering it hits closer to home with him than anyone else on this site. JaTo continues to be prove that he reads and absorbs entirely too historical information and Tony still has his priorities right where they should be. For the most part, everyone in this thread has kept themselves in line and have avoided what could easily turn into a flame fest. Thanks to everyone for proving rational conversations can occur about controversial subjects.

"If you are flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit" -Mitch Hedberg