Originally posted by bishop375: Still more examples- having known a gay couple (both women) who had their civil union, were committed enough that they were willing to spend 10's of thousands of dollars on insemination treatments, to finally get pregnant and raise a child in what could be the most loving environment I've ever seen, how does that affect your view, or does it mean that they are an exception to the rule?
So why insist on the term marriage. Once you define marriage as anything other than and adult man and woman, then you open a can of worms. Beastiality advocates will fight for thier right to marry farm animals, polygimists will fight for thier right to marry mulitiple partners, etc.
exactly.
This is a perfect example of the illogical slippery slope comments I have heard and read in the past. You really don't buy into that, do you?
I don't doubt at all that someone would try this, but it would be quickly flushed out the judicial system.
"If you are flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a fire exit"
-Mitch Hedberg
