Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
#1402153 10/07/05 03:26 AM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,141
P
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
P
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,141
Originally posted by RTStabler51:
I doubt it'll work...




i don't want to install a full sho intake, i just want to use the tubes....id they're sized right, for the on i'll be building.

It's bamn near impossible to find AL tubing bent as sharply as the contour UIM and the sho tube is as close as i've seen.


99 SE V6\5spd - 156 HP\157 TQ 15.166-90.84 Totaled 02/12/06 99 SVT # 1571 - 175 HP\153 TQ 14.999-91.88 Born 3/24/99 Reborn 3/18/06 Pietenpol Racing Technologies project vehicle 90 Festiva L 5spd, Blue(not for long), 103k
#1402154 10/07/05 04:26 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,155
P
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
P
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,155
Originally posted by Marky:
Much larger. Look at the location of the brake fluid res. in relationship to where the IM/TB mate on both cars. I also noticed the SHO has a non-stock coolant tank.




I'll also add the height of the SHO engine versus the Duratec exceeds a Contours hoodline. But, this could be merely the mounting rigged up for the yellow focus..

The Duratec after all is an inefficient re-design of what was originally envisioned. I've always felt the Duratec was a bit heavy and a bit large to be so .. lacking. If that makes any sense I suppose this applies more towards the non-svt Duratec.

Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  GTO Pete 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5