Originally posted by MadMerc97:
Originally posted by Majisto:
The Mustang lives and the F-body has died. Must we go on? My aunt's 3rd Gen Camaro was a disaster. The 305 was definitely a boat anchor. I don't know which is worse, the 305 or the Olds 307 in my girlfriend's old Caprice.

My grandma died, but that doesn't mean she wasn't great. The same goes for the F-Body. What are you trying to prove with that statement?


That the F-body as a car is junk. The window motors, leaks, paint quality, rear end (The GM rear ends are glass; surprised nobody brought this up), and many other things in addition to the bad safety record that made GM cancel it. The F-body has always played second fiddle to the Mustang in terms of quality. Yes, there are many F-bodies that could out-muscle a Mustang, but it is not a better car. The Fox's quadra-shocks were a joke, but the F-body is an inferior car. This is the automobile world where cars are driven by demand and profits. This has nothing to do with the natural course of life. To compare the two is just silly. It just means you have no other way to back up your statement.

2000 Contour SE