|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,197
I have no life
|
I have no life
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,197 |
-'96 SE MTX 3L
-'98 SVT 1,173 of 6,535
-'05 Mazda 6s, loaded, g/f's ride
-Need a 96-00 manual on CD? PM or email me
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,978
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,978 |
Couldnt hurt a contour owner to try it... Who knows maybe they would even be interested in slightly altering them to fit our platform...
Alex
'99 SVT Contour
-=|WANTED: Vortech, working or not |=-
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106
Addicted CEG\'er
|
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106 |
Originally posted by todras:
I'll kiss RT's bare ass if Mazda 6 headers fit a Contour w/o modification.
Nobody seems to complain about having to modify the WR's 
Mark
2000 Black CSVT
3.0L Hybrid - 206fwhp & 195fwtq
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,197
I have no life
|
|
I have no life
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 21,197 |
Uuu slightly different modifying an EGR tube or just buying the correct Cougar EGR than 30% of the 6 piping rubbing.  
-'96 SE MTX 3L
-'98 SVT 1,173 of 6,535
-'05 Mazda 6s, loaded, g/f's ride
-Need a 96-00 manual on CD? PM or email me
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 110
CEG\'er
|
|
CEG\'er
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 110 |
Where exactly is Beltsville. I'm located in Westminster.
What advantages do long tubes have over the shorties already offered?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106
Addicted CEG\'er
|
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106 |
Originally posted by todras:
Uuu slightly different modifying an EGR tube or just buying the correct Cougar EGR than 30% of the 6 piping rubbing.
Twas a joke  . And 30% of 6 = 1.8
Mark
2000 Black CSVT
3.0L Hybrid - 206fwhp & 195fwtq
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 240
CEG\'er
|
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 240 |
Originally posted by rac74:
Where exactly is Beltsville. I'm located in Westminster.
What advantages do long tubes have over the shorties already offered?
I am sure Demon can better explain it to me, but with equal length tubes, the scavenging wave is equal in both banks. Just about sucks all the gas out of the cylinders instead of naturally being pushed out, i.e. more effecient than shorties.
Equaling out the pulses eliminates the need or desire of an h-pipe or x-pipe.
Not to mention the sound difference between equal length and unequal length headers  
As for where CP-e is:
Custom Performance Engineering
6802 Mid Cities Ave.,
Beltsville, MD 20705
Phone:
Sales: Josh Adams (410) 703-9365
Tech Support: Anthony Messina (301) 693-7531
Email:
sales@cp-e.com
customerservice@cp-e.com
info@cp-e.com
Driving the Caliber
Side project: The LT-5 Fiero is being born..
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,087
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,087 |
Originally posted by rac74:
Where exactly is Beltsville. I'm located in Westminster.
What advantages do long tubes have over the shorties already offered?
IIRC the SHM headers had a much broader torque curve increase (aka more area under the curve) than the MSDS headers.
Matt
2002 Subaru Impreza WRX (WRB Stage 4+)
Old Rides:
1999 Sil-Fro SVT Contour 3.0L with goodies (Totalled 6/21/06)
1988 Bronco II (Sold)
You know you launch hard when you beat oncoming traffic through their own crosswalk lines.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by Bronco_II:
IIRC the SHM headers had a much broader torque curve increase (aka more area under the curve) than the MSDS headers.
That is "what has been said" however the simple truth is no one ever dyno proved any difference between the two. Matter of fact there are 2 rather low dynos with folks using SHM headers. (there are few dynos with SHM's btw)
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,087
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,087 |
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
Originally posted by Bronco_II:
IIRC the SHM headers had a much broader torque curve increase (aka more area under the curve) than the MSDS headers.
That is "what has been said" however the simple truth is no one ever dyno proved any difference between the two. Matter of fact there are 2 rather low dynos with folks using SHM headers. (there are few dynos with SHM's btw)
You are probably right, but I do seem to remember a guy that put down ~190 hp in (I believe) a 2000 2.5L CSVT with SHM headers (among other things). I can't remember his name, but it was the last dyno I saw of anyone with the SHM headers. Also I know, it's only one guy, but I still would like to find that dyno graph of his.
Matt
2002 Subaru Impreza WRX (WRB Stage 4+)
Old Rides:
1999 Sil-Fro SVT Contour 3.0L with goodies (Totalled 6/21/06)
1988 Bronco II (Sold)
You know you launch hard when you beat oncoming traffic through their own crosswalk lines.
|
|
|
|
|
