Did anybody else notice Pale Horse lacking something here?
Originally posted by Pale Horse:
"good lord...this is rediculous. that's all i have to say now.
this forum is for the discussion of topics relevant specifically to scceg.
so, basically, we should change the title of ""moderator"" to ""dictator"", since i am now to be told what is relevant discussion in our regional forum.
as long as no one gets out of hand and starts making derrogotory comments about other members, and there is no dicussion of street racing or other illegal activities; then what is the problem??? not trying to go over your head louis, just offering up some other aspects."
Originally posted by Pale Horse:
this is no longer about the ultimate topic. this has turned into something a little more i think. it seems to me that the idea of voting on this ""unlocking"" struck a nerve somewhere with you louis. did you think that because you recieved a couple pm's thanking you, that the rest of us would sit idly by? i don't really mind the fact that you denied unlocking the thread...that's fine...but the reasons you cited were incredibly short-sighted and make no sense in conjunction with the ""guidelines"". it makes me uneasy about the fact that you are our moderator. i feel now that you will lock a thread if it doesn't meet your approval or fit into your guidelines. i'm honestly not trying to attack your personal or moral agendas...but there's gotta be something more to this than: ""because i said so"".
