Originally posted by warmonger:

So I'm not saying RP is bad. I'm just saying the logic is hypocritical.





And why is that? Terry never said RP meets the Ford specs but from data I've seen it's a good alternative for the price. From reading info here it seems like a far better choice than MTL. Sure doesn't have the high sulfer content or some of the additives MTL does. I don't see anyone else here sending samples of lubes to the lab and posting the results. I think someone else should put up the $ to prove that RP isn't a good alternative.

-'96 SE MTX 3L -'98 SVT 1,173 of 6,535 -'05 Mazda 6s, loaded, g/f's ride -Need a 96-00 manual on CD? PM or email me