Originally posted by todras:
I was looking back at some
{edit}
very best post by demon.


You can tell a LOT has been learned in 5 & a half years.

That was back when I "believed" what was being spouted and did not do my own research. I lot has changed since that time. I've found out most of the bullsh~t this site was spouting was just that. Someone's sorry limitations they could not see past.

Hell the stock rods didn't break at 200 TQ like someone predicted. (Terry)
The new style stock PCM & rev limiters was cracked even though someone said it could never be done. (Leo)
ATF was proven to be the worst thing to run in the MTX. Even Terry described horror stories or transmissions with the "cocktail" in it after that time. This was back when he started strongly recommending the "new" Ford honey. Check out those posts todras.
Forced induction on a 10.3CR SVT. It was called impossible and just plan stupid because the engine would break. 13psi and 330FWHP later the stock 2000 2.5L SVT engine shut all those blind folks up. 9psi and 330HP/TQ later on a bone stock bargain basement setup Tom shut everyone up again.


I guess it's a good thing some people stopped listening to the mindless drivel some folks kept clinging to because they OBVIOUSLY (hind sight is 20/20) were not even close to the truth.


BTW I noticed you completely skipped over my posts about 2 years later (3-3.5 years ago!) when I starting to go away from listening to the "norm" and actually did some REAL research myself on the subject.
I like how you picked the very old, early threads and skipped any thing that proved my point.

Those sound bites sound convincing but in reality it just proves your short sightedness and limited thinking. In other words it is exactly what I expected from you.

Should I post the more current & relevant threads???

2000 SVT #674 13.47 @ 102 - All Motor! It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.