Originally posted by unisys12:
That was when all this got started. Upperlevel Admins thought it was not prudent to allow the post to stay up and a few mods pointed out that it wasn't right to allow one and say the another was a legal issue. I and a few others pointed out that they were all legal issues and what was good for the goose is good for the gander. We never recieved a further response.



Why has the issue never been debated then?

Originally posted by unisys12:

Again, since I only have control of the forums I moderate, I will moderate them in a way that I see meets the interest of this community.



And you've been a fantastic mod... My hat to you sir.

Originally posted by unisys12:

Even though the link above does provide a great deal of information to the community, it is piriated information and we cannot support it.



And this is where i'd like to see some explanation or at least some form of debate or comentary on the subject.

Is it that ALL questionable material does not receive the support of the management of this forum? If so than why is it supported for some and not others?

You phrased it well when you said "what's good for the goose..."
Why is that level of fairness not applied to all? How can the management ask for all members of the site to contribute in a monentary form, yet blantly play favorites with a few 'chums'? I fail to see how this policy is being administered fairly. What is the reasoning behind this?

Thank you for your input unisys.


96 LX 3.0L MTX - Black/Tan K&N; 12lb F/W & uprated clutch 2.5" Pipe; SVT bits; Mystery Mod; Pull-tie Mod; UN-tuned Mod; 3rd Gear Synro-Crunch Mod 280K on the Shell, and 40ish on the Motor... 1/4 mile?? Yeah, it's a fun daily driver...