Originally posted by Davo:
Originally posted by ODC:
Fossil's are pretty clear cut in what they are. To argue otherwise is to say that the world is flat.


How do you know? Did you see the animals that fossils represent? Did you talk to them? Did you have a beer at the game with them? I'm simply using all arguments you use against faith against science. Do I believe fossils represent dead animals? Yes. Are there some who think God put fossils there to confuse us? Yes. I'm trying to get you to see that 'pretty clear cut in what they are' is different for a lot of people.

Originally posted by ODC:
I'm not arguing.

I'm stating fact.

Having faith is harder than understanding evolution.


Okay, so you'll agree that the use of Occam's Razor earlier in this thread is invalid?



Your argument of "seeing the change" is a fallacy. Carbon fossilizes after a long period of time. After fossilization, it turns into oil. It's basic science like basic math, prove to me that 1 * 0 = 0 ? I want to see the stick or unit that you're going to multiply dissapear into thin air. That's the argument you're propagating.

And no, it actually validates my point with Occam's Razor. In terms of simplicity, Evolution > Religion, hence, evolution is the better option.