Originally posted by DopePope:
i didnt read the article, so my opinion isnt worth much, but if carbon datings reliability is an issue, hasn't it been proven many times to be fairly inaccurate?
as far as evolution/darwinism is concerned, who cares? if you believe one way and you are right, if it turns out you're wrong, sucks for you.



That's such a fallacy to argue that. Just because its been inaccurate and wrong at times due to human error, it can't be used as a tool ?

log(15) = log(3x - 8x)

If some dolt got x=1 out of that equation instead of x=-3 doesn't necessitate that the laws of math are incorrect.