Originally posted by 96RedSE5Sp:And wait a second. You really believe that Paul O'Neil is part of some elaborate anti-Bush conspiracy yet you accept the word of Glen Beck as gospel?
1. Not an elaborate conspiracy. Just a disgruntled former Bush Admin official who needed to sell a book, exactly like I said. You always fail when to try to put words into my mouth, so I don't know why you keep doing it. 2. Not sure how one can consider the opinion of another to be Gospel. If you're referring to the link I posted to his site, that was more or less a collection of quotes. There isn't one word of opinion from Glenn Beck on that page.
Originally posted by 96RedSE5Sp:Tell me, what evidence leads you to conclude that the Bush Administration was objectively assessing intelligence in order to determinine whether to attack Iraq in the aftermath of 9/11? Can you name any legitimate (i.e. not owned by Rupert Murdoch or the Rev. Moon) newspaper or TV network that supports your theory?
LMAO again. So journalists have to bless something in order for it to be true? Bwaahahaaaaaaahhaaaaaahhaaaaaaa
LMAO 
