Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Page 5 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,970
S
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
S
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,970
Watch "Dead Wrong" on CNN @ 8pm EST. These "conspiracy theories" are going to be gone through in detail by people who were in Dubbya's inner circle.


2005 Ford F150 SuperCab FX4 1964 Chevrolet Impala SS 1998 CSVT: 354HP/328TQ @ 10 psi, now gone
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 678
9
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
9
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 678
Originally posted by Corbett:
No I rely on what we know, not what you theorize.




Fair enough. Tell us what you know about Ahmed Chalabi and "Curveball".

Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,710
C
Hard-core CEG\'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG\'er
C
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,710
Originally posted by 96RedSE5Sp:

Fair enough. Tell us what you know about Ahmed Chalabi and "Curveball".




Tell me how you know "Clearly it was a major goal of the neo-cons and the Bush Adminstration to somehow justify a war against Iraq - even before September 11"

I know it wasnt a goal of mine.


- Tim
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 678
9
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
9
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 678
Ten Sources off the top of my head:

01. Author/Biographer Mickey Herskowitz

02. Former Treasury Secretary Secretary Paul O'Neil

03. Former WHite House Advisor Richard Clarke

04. Former Wall Street Journal Reporter Ron Suskind

05. The Downing Street Memo

06. Senator Chuck Rangel (DNY)

07. The Project for a New American Century (PNAC) Manifesto

08. Retired Army General and former director of the NSA William Odom

09. Author Robert Woodward

10. Author James Bamford



Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198
Originally posted by 96RedSE5Sp:
Ten Sources off the top of my head:

01. Author/Biographer Mickey Herskowitz

02. Former Treasury Secretary Secretary Paul O'Neil

03. Former WHite House Advisor Richard Clarke

04. Former Wall Street Journal Reporter Ron Suskind

05. The Downing Street Memo

06. Senator Chuck Rangel (DNY)

07. The Project for a New American Century (PNAC) Manifesto

08. Retired Army General and former director of the NSA William Odom

09. Author Robert Woodward

10. Author James Bamford






1.

2. Disgruntled former Admin official wanted his name in the paper.

3. Disgruntled former Admin official wanted his name in the paper.

4.

5. So...British intelligence that justifies war is no good but a memo written by a shady Brit is Gospel?

6. You must be kidding.

7.

8.

9. Former liberal media superstar wanted his name in the paper again.

10.

Last edited by Davo; 08/22/05 02:23 AM.
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 678
9
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
9
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 678
11. CNN

12. ABC

13. NBC

14. NY Times

15. Washington Post

And wait a second. You really believe that Paul O'Neil is part of some elaborate anti-Bush conspiracy yet you accept the word of Glen Beck as gospel?

Tell me, what evidence leads you to conclude that the Bush Administration was objectively assessing intelligence in order to determinine whether to attack Iraq in the aftermath of 9/11? Can you name any legitimate (i.e. not owned by Rupert Murdoch or the Rev. Moon) newspaper or TV network that supports your theory?

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198
Originally posted by 96RedSE5Sp:
11. CNN

12. ABC

13. NBC

14. NY Times

15. Washington Post




LMAO

Originally posted by 96RedSE5Sp:
And wait a second. You really believe that Paul O'Neil is part of some elaborate anti-Bush conspiracy yet you accept the word of Glen Beck as gospel?



1. Not an elaborate conspiracy. Just a disgruntled former Bush Admin official who needed to sell a book, exactly like I said. You always fail when to try to put words into my mouth, so I don't know why you keep doing it.
2. Not sure how one can consider the opinion of another to be Gospel. If you're referring to the link I posted to his site, that was more or less a collection of quotes. There isn't one word of opinion from Glenn Beck on that page.

Originally posted by 96RedSE5Sp:
Tell me, what evidence leads you to conclude that the Bush Administration was objectively assessing intelligence in order to determinine whether to attack Iraq in the aftermath of 9/11? Can you name any legitimate (i.e. not owned by Rupert Murdoch or the Rev. Moon) newspaper or TV network that supports your theory?



LMAO again. So journalists have to bless something in order for it to be true? Bwaahahaaaaaaahhaaaaaahhaaaaaaa

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 678
9
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
9
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 678
16. John Dean

17. Newsweek

18. The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

19. Former US Marine Major and UN Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter

20. Herman Goering

21. S. Eugene Poteat - Pesident of the Acssociation of Former Intelligence Officers (McLean, VA)

Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 678
9
Veteran CEG\'er
Offline
Veteran CEG\'er
9
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 678
Originally posted by Davo:

LMAO again. So journalists have to bless something in order for it to be true? Bwaahahaaaaaaahhaaaaaahhaaaaaaa




So the knowledge and information that you have about the Bush Administration's role in the Iraq War does not come from anything you have read or seen on TV, the radio or the internet? Where do you get your information? Do you have an inside source in the White House?

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198
D
Hard-core CEG'er
Offline
Hard-core CEG'er
D
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,198
I don't have to have an inside source. All I need is to know and understand the facts, and use my judgement to come to a conclusion. But I am curious as to how you include all these unbiased news outlets such as CNN and CBS as valid sources of information yet you want to discount something owned by Rupert Murdoch?

Page 5 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5