|
|
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 611
Veteran CEG\'er
|
Veteran CEG\'er
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 611 |
Quite possible. Do you have an ADC chip in your car. If you get a tune you should get more torque than hp. I still don't have a chip but I will eventually. Right now it is just tuned with my Apexi S-AFC.
The car I built for NateS ended up with 200tq and in the 190's for hp. I had a chip made for that car. It was a full oval port ported to svt intakes. All stock svt parts otherwise not even gutted cats or an intake.
1999 3.0L Cougar: 220fwhp and 200tq
2003 VW Passat W8 with 4 Motion AWD
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/300644
PM for intrest in 3L SVT Contours, 3L swaps into your current car, Prepped 3L engines, or anything 3L related.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by rkneeshaw3.0:
I'm curious why some here have such low torque numbers. I put down 189hp/186tq at the wheels with stock pre-cats/stock SVT exhaust/bat-y/2.5L stock SVT heads and cams/SVT LIM+UIM+TB+K&N. If I open my exhuast up with headers or optimal cat-bak (or both) am I going to see a drop in torque and increase in HP?
Are you claiming before IMRC Torque numbers? (below 4000 rpm)
Many people do not claim that because it's a false indication of the true powerband.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,570
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,570 |
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
Originally posted by rkneeshaw3.0:
I'm curious why some here have such low torque numbers. I put down 189hp/186tq at the wheels with stock pre-cats/stock SVT exhaust/bat-y/2.5L stock SVT heads and cams/SVT LIM+UIM+TB+K&N. If I open my exhuast up with headers or optimal cat-bak (or both) am I going to see a drop in torque and increase in HP?
Are you claiming before IMRC Torque numbers? (below 4000 rpm)
Many people do not claim that because it's a false indication of the true powerband.
This is what I'm claiming:
I love the torque and would hate to loose it by opening up the exhaust. I wish I understood the relationship between torque and HP better 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,570
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,570 |
Originally posted by Blackcoog:
Quite possible. Do you have an ADC chip in your car. If you get a tune you should get more torque than hp. I still don't have a chip but I will eventually. Right now it is just tuned with my Apexi S-AFC.
The car I built for NateS ended up with 200tq and in the 190's for hp. I had a chip made for that car. It was a full oval port ported to svt intakes. All stock svt parts otherwise not even gutted cats or an intake.
Yup, I have a ADC chip. That makes sense then. It seems oval port head installs have that extra 10-15 ft-lbs of torque than the SVT head installs. The HP is right on. My setup is basicly just that; a stock SVT except BAT y-pipe and 3L shortblock (minus fidanza and quaife in the driveline but I didn't think that counted here hehe).
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 7,025 |
Originally posted by rkneeshaw3.0:
Yup, I have a ADC chip. That makes sense then. It seems oval port head installs have that extra 10-15 ft-lbs of torque than the SVT head installs. The HP is right on. My setup is basicly just that; a stock SVT except BAT y-pipe and 3L shortblock (minus fidanza and quaife in the driveline but I didn't think that counted here hehe).
Marks 3.0L split port hybrid made 195 wtq.
Jim Hahn
1996 T-Red Contour SE Reborn 4/6/04
3.0L swap and Arizona Dyno Chip Turbo Kit
364 whp, 410 wtq @ 4,700 rpm
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106
Addicted CEG\'er
|
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106 |
Originally posted by beyondloadedSE:
Originally posted by rkneeshaw3.0:
Yup, I have a ADC chip. That makes sense then. It seems oval port head installs have that extra 10-15 ft-lbs of torque than the SVT head installs. The HP is right on. My setup is basicly just that; a stock SVT except BAT y-pipe and 3L shortblock (minus fidanza and quaife in the driveline but I didn't think that counted here hehe).
Marks 3.0L split port hybrid made 195 wtq.
True dat! 
Mark
2000 Black CSVT
3.0L Hybrid - 206fwhp & 195fwtq
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,975
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,975 |
That's it, I know it's not realistic to compare dyno #s, but I need to get my 3L on a DynoJet.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106
Addicted CEG\'er
|
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106 |
Originally posted by SVT PETE:
That's it, I know it's not realistic to compare dyno #s, but I need to get my 3L on a DynoJet.
 Was my post the straw that broke the camel's back? If so, then GOOD! Cause I've been wanting to see what kind of power your car makes on a Dynojet!
IIRC, you've got the SHM headers correct? What kind of headwork?
Mark
2000 Black CSVT
3.0L Hybrid - 206fwhp & 195fwtq
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,975
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,975 |
Originally posted by Y2KSVT:
Originally posted by SVT PETE:
That's it, I know it's not realistic to compare dyno #s, but I need to get my 3L on a DynoJet.
Was my post the straw that broke the camel's back? If so, then GOOD! Cause I've been wanting to see what kind of power your car makes on a Dynojet!
IIRC, you've got the SHM headers correct? What kind of headwork?
It's the fact that 9+/10 dyno on DynoJets. I would loosely like to see where I stand.
3.0 hybrid by DanG
Ported & polished heads by kinger
SHM long tube headers, Jet Hot coated
Extrude Honed Power Flow UIM, Jet Hot coated
CTA intake pipe, Jet Hot coated
65mm throttle body, optimized
AFE 8" filter
Bassani cat-back exhaust
Edelbrock muffler (resonator)
Torsen LSD
SPEC Stage 1 clutch
SPEC flywheel
If I have money after paying for the wedding, hopefully a chip/tune.
As a comparison on a Mustang dyno:
scottd60 w/ intake Bassani
159.0hp, 127.6tq
Myself: 202.4hp, 177tq
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106
Addicted CEG\'er
|
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106 |
Originally posted by SVT PETE:
3.0 hybrid by DanG
Ported & polished heads by kinger
SHM long tube headers, Jet Hot coated
Extrude Honed Power Flow UIM, Jet Hot coated
CTA intake pipe, Jet Hot coated
65mm throttle body, optimized
AFE 8" filter
Bassani cat-back exhaust
Edelbrock muffler (resonator)
Torsen LSD
SPEC Stage 1 clutch
SPEC flywheel
If I have money after paying for the wedding, hopefully a chip/tune.
202.4hp, 177tq
That is very bizarre to me to see such low torque #'s, especially with the long tubes! You've actually got a very similar setup to mine, as I'm running a hybrid with 65mm T/B, CTA pipe, 8" filter, Bassani catback w/ Magnaflow res. Only real difference is that you've got PnP heads, what appears to be a Max E/H UIM??, and long tubes as opposed to my shorties. I think you'll see a LOT of power once you get it tuned, and everything is dialed in. What injectors are you running right now? Stock MAF?
Mark
2000 Black CSVT
3.0L Hybrid - 206fwhp & 195fwtq
|
|
|
|
|
