|
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,695
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,695 |
Don't forget you'll probably have to change all your tables to compensate for the massive load differences... unless you have that part from the old chip.
04 Subaru WRX "Eurosport bling bling fast and furious tokyo drift"
"They have diarrhea of the mouth, and constipation of thought"
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810 |
Originally posted by WRX Barge: Don't forget you'll probably have to change all your tables to compensate for the massive load differences... unless you have that part from the old chip.
So is there any correlation between boost pressure ratio and engine load? Max load for the tables in the software is about 2.0 but enters in as 1.989 or something like that. I'm experimenting with this setup right now. I got the car running yesterday and I entered my first tune. It seemed to flash ok but it is throwing rich codes for both banks almost immediately. I'm addressing that issue but I don't have any practical basis for the load values.
Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760
356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas!
See My Mods
'05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red
'06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,970
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,970 |
War,
I got my SVT's laptop online, and have converted my tune so that you can check it out. I emailed it to you just a few minutes ago.
2005 Ford F150 SuperCab FX4
1964 Chevrolet Impala SS
1998 CSVT: 354HP/328TQ @ 10 psi, now gone
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810 |
Awesome. I just checked it out and I can read your values. I'll look into saving my own the same way. I have to get up early so I'm signing off now but I'll talk more tomorrow or this weekend.
Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760
356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas!
See My Mods
'05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red
'06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,970
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,970 |
Cool beans. To save to a .val file, simply "select all values" and "save all values". If you weren't able to see the SC'd 2.5L tune, I can convert that one too. One final thing, you can compare two tunes with the advantage software. It saves the info in .txt format, and by comparing my tune with the SC'd tune.... I can see how incomplete my MD base tune really is
2005 Ford F150 SuperCab FX4
1964 Chevrolet Impala SS
1998 CSVT: 354HP/328TQ @ 10 psi, now gone
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,860
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,860 |
For reference the stock Lightning runs at 1.6 load value.
2001 Lincoln LS8
1994 Lexus GS300
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810 |
Originally posted by Swazo: Cool beans. To save to a .val file, simply "select all values" and "save all values". If you weren't able to see the SC'd 2.5L tune, I can convert that one too.
One final thing, you can compare two tunes with the advantage software. It saves the info in .txt format, and by comparing my tune with the SC'd tune.... I can see how incomplete my MD base tune really is
Yeah. When I looked at it that is what I thought too. It just goes to show you how fuggin lazy so many people are. I tell you when you find someone who will actually be conscientious about their work, KEEP EM. Pay them what they're worth.
If you can convert that SC'd 2.5L I'd appreciate it since I could not read it.
Last edited by warmonger; 09/08/05 12:42 AM.
Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760
356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas!
See My Mods
'05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red
'06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810 |
Originally posted by Keyser: For reference the stock Lightning runs at 1.6 load value.
Awesome. Chris you're the man! What is the stock boost pressure that they run at?
Do you by any chance remember anything about the chip you burned for me insofar as the load values, spark timing limits, etc?
I'm building my second tune right now and I am going about it logically, but it would be very nice to see what I was at before.
Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760
356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas!
See My Mods
'05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red
'06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
1.6 load level equates to .6 bar (~9psi) of boost on top of 100% Volumetric Efficiency. Scale from there.
The important part in tuning is making sure 100% load is actually 100%. After that it's all down hill because the PCM calculates everything correctly for you.
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,970
Hard-core CEG'er
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,970 |
Originally posted by Keyser: For reference the stock Lightning runs at 1.6 load value.
.... and 2nd Gen's with a Kenne Bell running high boost can see as much as 200%
2005 Ford F150 SuperCab FX4
1964 Chevrolet Impala SS
1998 CSVT: 354HP/328TQ @ 10 psi, now gone
|
|
|
|
|