|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,392
Addicted CEG\'er
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,392 |
demon may not know everything, but he knows his timeslips and the corresponding cars that would run those numbers. when i posted my fake 14.2 timeslip, he knew the EXACT car that i stole the times from. 
02 Mustang GT... Tuned by Nelsons. Low 12's, anyone? 
.....______
___|______\_____
|/-\_________/-\_|
.\_/...............\_/
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106
Addicted CEG\'er
|
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,106 |
Originally posted by RTStabler51:
he had an untouched long block...heads were box stock...
Originally posted by Y2KSVT:
, and he had PnP heads, headers
Mark
I stand corrected. Then maybe he did some port matching atleast? All I remember were the approximate dyno #'s, being 191HP and 18XTQ. Very impressive out of a 2.5L.
Mark
2000 Black CSVT
3.0L Hybrid - 206fwhp & 195fwtq
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,571
Hard-core CEG\'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG\'er
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,571 |
Originally posted by RTStabler51:
Are you positive your gains were from the chip and not driving? The average stock CSVT should pulle low-mid 15s easily.
Originally posted by ryanblacksvt:
you only dropped 2/10th's damn i dropped over 7/10th's and gained 5 mph. i went from a 15.99 to a 15.24 with only my chip. and wayne and i have done the datalogging and afr and he is getting them up here probly today
yes i am 100% sure it was from the tune and thats it, i drove the exact same way i did the prior run. i dont ever change anything when i run the 1/4 mile. and who says that 7/10's equals 70 hp???
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 184
CEG\'er
|
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 184 |
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
Originally posted by beyondloadedSE:
cool..timeslips?
Video proof.
14.6 @ only 92mph... Something's very fishy...
Only 17mph on the top end???
Looks very RWD V8 to me...
its called lack of horse power. 
how much mph can you get from 200 horse???
its pretty sad (for Mustangs) that my SVT is only 1 tenth and 3 mph slower than my 96 Saleen when I first got it.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,392
Addicted CEG\'er
|
|
Addicted CEG\'er
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 7,392 |
Originally posted by racerbox77:
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
Originally posted by beyondloadedSE:
cool..timeslips?
Video proof.
14.6 @ only 92mph... Something's very fishy...
Only 17mph on the top end???
Looks very RWD V8 to me...
its called lack of horse power.
how much mph can you get from 200 horse???
its pretty sad (for Mustangs) that my SVT is only 1 tenth and 3 mph slower than my 96 Saleen when I first got it.
96 is one of the worst years ever for a mustang, and all the saleen had was extra weight and beauty.
02 Mustang GT... Tuned by Nelsons. Low 12's, anyone?
.....______
___|______\_____
|/-\_________/-\_|
.\_/...............\_/
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 184
CEG\'er
|
|
OP
CEG\'er
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 184 |
I know but the beauty was worth the price tag. DAMN that car looked sweet. 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810 |
that would be the crux of the problem for me too. I am going to just give the benefit of the doubt but I have to admit that is pretty fast for his HP level.
On the other hand Demon was able to turn 14's with just a mail order chip if I recall. I think it was 14.8x or something. So there are factory freaks and the freaks that drive them.
Nothing he posted is completely way out there, rather it looks more like every "good" thing went right on his drag runs and that is the result. Or its fabricated. I don't really know.
Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760
356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas!
See My Mods
'05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red
'06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 5,810 |
Originally posted by MxRacerCam:
demon may not know everything, but he knows his timeslips and the corresponding cars that would run those numbers. when i posted my fake 14.2 timeslip, he knew the EXACT car that i stole the times from.
Hahaha. NOw that's really good! 
And you can admit it? Assuming it wasn't a joke, that takes some balls.
Former owner of '99 CSVT - Silver #222/2760
356/334 wHP/TQ at 10psi on pump gas!
See My Mods
'05 Volvo S40 Turbo 5 AWD with 6spd, Passion Red
'06 Mazda5 Touring, 5spd,MTX, Black
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 9,602 |
Originally posted by warmonger:
On the other hand Demon was able to turn 14's with just a mail order chip if I recall. I think it was 14.8x or something. So there are factory freaks and the freaks that drive them.
I wish it were just that.
It was a semi custom chip (I helped build the first XGT1 program for Superchips), custom exhaust, intake, ported TB, MAF, etc before I hit 14's... I will admit our local track sucks but then I've always said that.
His times just don't add up.
A 9.4 1/8th mile with just a 2.2x is faster then the previous record of a 190+/170 2000 SVT with DR's, LSD, and a 2.02 60' running at Houston Raceway Park. (i.e killer sea level track!) It's just NOT going to happen. PERIOD.
Anyway I'm done with this thread and probably this forum. Too much bullsh~t flying around. I'll stick to just driving my own car. 
2000 SVT #674
13.47 @ 102 - All Motor!
It was not broke; Yet I fixed it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760
Hard-core CEG'er
|
|
Hard-core CEG'er
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 6,760 |
Yes and Contours are known for their torque! Originally posted by racerbox77:
Originally posted by DemonSVT:
Originally posted by beyondloadedSE:
cool..timeslips?
Video proof.
14.6 @ only 92mph... Something's very fishy...
Only 17mph on the top end???
Looks very RWD V8 to me...
its called lack of horse power.
how much mph can you get from 200 horse???
its pretty sad (for Mustangs) that my SVT is only 1 tenth and 3 mph slower than my 96 Saleen when I first got it.
Ryan
Trollin!
|
|
|
|
|
